The team halo effect: why teams are not blamed for their failures.

In this study, the existence of the team halo effect, the phenomenon that teams tend not to be blamed for their failures, is documented. With 2 studies using both real teams and controlled scenarios, the authors found evidence that the nature of the causal attribution processes used to diagnose failure scenarios leads to individuals being more likely to be identified as the cause of team failure than the team as a collective. Team schema development, as indexed by team experience, influences this effect, with individuals who have more team experience being less likely to show the team halo effect

[1]  I. Janis Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[2]  N. Roese,et al.  Counterfactual Thinking: The Intersection of Affect and Function , 1997 .

[3]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[4]  I. Steiner Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[5]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[6]  G. Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods , 1993 .

[7]  M. Hallahan,et al.  Explaining Real-Life Events: How Culture and Domain Shape Attributions , 1996 .

[8]  A. L. McGill Selection of a causal background: Role of expectation versus feature mutability. , 1993 .

[9]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. , 1982 .

[10]  L. Sanna,et al.  Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence , 1996 .

[11]  N. Roese,et al.  The Structure of Counterfactual Thought , 1993 .

[12]  The struggle to create an organization for the 21st century. , 1995, Fortune.

[13]  T. Wall,et al.  The New Workplace , 2002 .

[14]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[15]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[16]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Making the Team: A Guide for Managers , 2003 .

[17]  K. Markman,et al.  The Mental Simulation of Better and Worse Possible Worlds , 1993 .

[18]  E. Salas,et al.  Team decision making in complex environments. , 1993 .

[19]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[20]  LorRaine Duffy Team decision-making biases: An information-processing perspective. , 1993 .

[21]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[22]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The discipline of teams. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[23]  D. Hilton,et al.  Knowledge-Based Causal Attribution: The Abnormal Conditions Focus Model , 1986 .

[24]  V. L. Allen,et al.  Veridical social support, extreme social support, and conformity. , 1977 .

[25]  J. B. Harvey The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement , 1974 .

[26]  K. Jehn A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[27]  K. Williams,et al.  Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. , 1981 .

[28]  Joan R. Rentsch,et al.  What You Know is What You Get from Experience , 1994 .

[29]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[30]  D. M. Georgoff,et al.  Harvard Business Review: David M. Georgoff and Robert G. Murdick, manager's guide to forecasting, 64 (Jan-Feb.) (1986) 110-120 , 1988 .

[31]  Carl E. Larson,et al.  When Teams Work Best: 6,000 Team Members and Leaders Tell What it Takes to Succeed , 2001 .

[32]  A. L. McGill,et al.  Contrastive and counterfactual reasoning in causal judgment. , 1993 .

[33]  J. Hackman Why Teams Don’t Work , 1998 .

[34]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Judging probable cause. , 1986 .

[35]  Carl E. Larson,et al.  Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong , 1989 .

[36]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizational Architecture: Designs for Changing Organizations , 1992 .

[37]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[38]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[39]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  The Dissatisfaction of Having Your First Offer Accepted: The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Negotiations , 2002 .

[40]  Brian Dumaine,et al.  The Trouble with Teams. , 1994 .

[41]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won , 1990 .

[42]  S. Barley The New World Of Work , 1996 .

[43]  C. M. Jagacinski Distinguishing Adding and Averaging Models in a Personnel Selection Task: When Missing Information Matters , 1995 .

[44]  A. L. McGill American and Thai Managers′ Explanations for Poor Company Performance: Role of Perspective and Culture in Causal Selection , 1995 .