A dual inheritance model of the human evolutionary process I: Basic postulates and a simple model

Human evolution presents special problems for Neo-Darwinian theory because a second system of inheritance, culture, is an important determinant of phenotype in our species. An elementary theory to explain how cultural inheritance affects the evolutionary process is developed from three basic postulates: (1) both genes and culture evolve by natural selection; (2) the reproductive fitness optimum as a function of phenotype is different for genes and culture because the rules of inheritance of the two systems are different; and (3) a genetic capacity for culture is assumed to be optimized by selection with respect to genetic fitness. The theory is formally a two-person variable sum game in which genes and culture compete to control phenotype, although the conservatively Neo-Darwinian capacity-for-culture assumption ensures that culture will benefit genotype. Simple mathematical models are used to deduce the general properties of equilibrium phenotypes. Results include the possibility that under some circumstances phenotype may be at the cultural rather than the genetic fitness optimum. Particularly if it is assumed that the capacity for culture is a general trait permitting many specific cultural ones, the culture capacity will be like a pleiotropic gene and many cultural traits are likely to be at the cultural optimum. The fact that in a majority of human societies, people bias their kinship behavior in ways unexpected from degree of genetic relatedness may be an example of the effect of selection on culture.

[1]  T. Dobzhansky Genetics of the Evolutionary Process , 1970 .

[2]  Robin Fox,et al.  The Imperial Animal , 1971 .

[3]  D. Campbell On the Genetics of Altruism and the Counter-Hedonic Components in Human Culture1 , 1972 .

[4]  J. Emlen Natural selection and human behavior. , 1966, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  W. Durham Resource Competition and Human Aggression, Part I: A Review of Primitive War , 1976, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[6]  C. D. Darlington The Evolution of Man and Society , 1970 .

[7]  Desmond Morris,et al.  The Naked Ape , 1967 .

[8]  George C. Williams,et al.  Sex and evolution. , 1975, Monographs in population biology.

[9]  S. Scarr-Salapatek Unknowns in the IQ Equation. (Book Reviews: Environment, Heredity, and Intelligence. Compiled from the Harvard Educational Review; The IQ Argument. Race, Intelligence and Education) , 1971 .

[10]  M W Feldman,et al.  Cultural versus biological inheritance: phenotypic transmission from parents to children. (A theory of the effect of parental phenotypes on children's phenotypes). , 1973, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  The comparative reception of Darwinism , 1976 .

[12]  F. Eggan The American Indian , 1966 .

[13]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments , 1968 .

[14]  D. Campbell On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. , 1976, Zygon.

[15]  A. Alchian Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory , 1950, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  C. Bajema Transmission of information about the environment in the human species: a cybernetic view of genetic and cultural evolution. , 1972, Social biology.

[17]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[18]  J. Emlen,et al.  Ecology : an evolutionary approach , 1973 .

[19]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior as Exchange , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  R. Trivers Parent-Offspring Conflict , 1974 .

[21]  F. Cloak THE EVOLUTIONARY SUCCESS OF ALTRUISM AND URBAN SOCIAL ORDER , 1976 .

[22]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.