An Empirical Investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Causal Model

The objective of this research is to test the theory and causal performance linkages implied by the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA). The survey instrument used a comprehensive set of 101 questions that were directly tied to specific criteria in the 1995 MBNQA Criteria. Results reported here represent the first published article that tests the MBNQA performance relationships and causal model using comprehensive measurement and structural models. In general, our research concludes that (1) The underlying theory of the MBNQA is supported that “leadership drives the system that causes results”; (2) Leadership is the most important driver of system performance; (3) Leadership has no direct effect on Financial Results but must influence overall performance “through the system”; (4) Information and Analysis is statistically the second most important Baldrige category; (5) the Baldrige category, Process Management, is twice as important when predicting customer satisfaction as when predicting financial results; and (6) a modified “within system” set of five Baldrige causal relationships is a good predictor of organizational performance.

[1]  David A. Collier,et al.  A Service Quality Process Map for Credit Card Processing , 1991 .

[2]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[3]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Time-limit tests: Estimating their reliability and degree of speeding , 1951, Psychometrika.

[4]  D. Garvin.  How the Baldrige Award really works. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[5]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  FEEDBACK AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE: PERSONAL STRATEGIES OF CREATING INFORMATION , 1983 .

[6]  T. C. Powell.  Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[7]  R. D. Buzzell,et al.  Product Quality, Cost Position and Business Performance: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses , 1983 .

[8]  David A. Collier,et al.  Modelling the relationships between process quality errors and overall service process performance , 1995 .

[9]  John C. Anderson,et al.  A Path Analytic Model of a Theory of Quality Management Underlying the Deming Management Method: Preliminary Empirical Findings* , 1995 .

[10]  W. Deming.  Improvement of quality and productivity through action by management , 1981 .

[11]  Victor E. McGee,et al.  Designing Lateral Organizations: An Analysis of the Benefits, Costs, and Enablers of Nonhierarchical Organizational Forms* , 1997 .

[12]  M. Terziovski,et al.  The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance , 1999 .

[13]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Empirical research methods in operations management , 1990 .

[14]  Betsy Wiesendanger.  Case Study: Deming's Luster Dims at Florida Power & Light , 1993 .

[15]  R. Handfield,et al.  Quality-Driven Change and its Effects on Financial Performance , 1998 .

[16]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[17]  Jayant V. Saraph,et al.  An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management , 1989 .

[18]  M. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. , 1979 .

[19]  Darryl D. Wilson,et al.  The Role of Automation and Labor in Determining Customer Satisfaction in a Telephone Repair Service Process , 1997 .

[20]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  SPECIFICATION SEARCHES IN COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELING , 1986 .

[21]  Everett E. Adam,et al.  Alternative quality improvement practices and organization performance , 1994 .

[22]  David A. Collier,et al.  Service, please: The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award , 1992 .

[23]  R. Schroeder,et al.  A THEORY OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT UNDERLYING THE DEMING MANAGEMENT METHOD , 1994 .