The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary Schools

This article presents the results of a research project on the phenomenon of out-of-field teaching in American high schools–teachers teaching subjects for which they have little education or training. Over the past couple of years, the problem of out-of-field teaching has become a prominent topic in the realm of educational policy and reform, and the results of this research have been widely reported and commented on both by education policymakers and the national media. But unfortunately, out-of-field teaching is a problem that remains largely misunderstood. My research utilizes nationally representative data from the Schools and Staffing Survey, conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics. The purpose of this article is to summarize what my research has revealed about out-of-field teaching: how much of it goes on; to what extent it varies across different subjects, across different kinds of schools, and across different kinds of classrooms; and finally, the reasons for its prevalence in American schools. The data show that even using a minimal standard for qualified teachers — those holding a college minor in the fields in which they teach —the numbers of out-of-field teachers are striking. For example, a third of all secondary school teachers of mathematics have neither a major nor a minor in mathematics. My analyses have also shown that out-of-field teaching greatly varies across schools, teachers, and classrooms. The crucial question, however, and the source of great misunderstanding is why so many teachers are teaching subjects for which they have little background. 1 examine three widely believed explanations of out-of-field teaching — that out-of-field teaching is a result of either inadequate training on the part of teachers, inflexible teacher unions, or shortages of qualified teachers. My analysis shows that each of these views is seriously flawed. The article closes by offering an alternative explanation for out-of-field teaching—one focused on the organizational structure of schools and the occupational conditions and characteristics of teaching.

[1]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Indicators for Monitoring Mathematics and Science Education , 1989 .

[2]  R. Ingersoll Teacher Supply, Teacher Qualifications, and Teacher Turnover: 1990-91. Schools and Staffing Survey. , 1995 .

[3]  D. Brewer,et al.  Evaluating the Effect of Teacher Degree Level on Educational Performance. , 1996 .

[4]  Anita A. Summers Who Will Teach?: Policies That Matter , 1991 .

[5]  The Education of American Teachers , 1963 .

[6]  R. Ingersoll An Agenda for Research on Teachers and Schools: Revisiting NCES' Schools and Staffing Survey. Working Paper Series. , 1995 .

[7]  Jeannie Oakes,et al.  Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science , 1990 .

[8]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  An Exchange: Part I* : Does Money Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Studies of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Outcomes , 1994 .

[9]  Improving Indicators of the Quality of Science and Mathematics Education in Grades K-12. , 1988 .

[10]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Teacher Quality and Inequality. , 1996 .

[11]  J. Waldron,et al.  Dirty Little Secret , 1998 .

[12]  N. Glazer In Search of Excellence and Equity in Our Nation's Schools , 1987 .

[13]  Hope Corman,et al.  Who will teach? Policies that matter: Richard J. Murnane, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett, James J. Kemple and Randall J. Olsen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991. XII + 187 p , 1993 .

[14]  J. Goodlad Access to Knowledge , 1983, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[15]  Ronald F. Ferguson Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money , 1991 .

[16]  W. Hawley,et al.  Choice and Control in American Education , 1992 .

[17]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[18]  Edward H. Haertel Chapter 1: New Forms of Teacher Assessment , 1991 .

[19]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  The Condition of education , 1975 .

[20]  W. Burian : The Semi-Professions and Their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers , 1970 .

[21]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Assessing Teacher Supply and Demand , 1988 .

[22]  J. Kozol Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools , 1992 .

[23]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools , 1986 .

[24]  E. Kaye Requirements for certification : of teachers, counselors, librarians, administrators for elementary and secondary schools , 2010 .

[25]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Pre-College Science and Mathematics Teachers: Supply, Demand, and Quality. , 1990 .

[26]  Edward H. Haertel New Forms of Teacher Assessment , 1991 .

[27]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Out-of-Field Teaching and Educational Equality , 1996 .

[28]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Doing what matters most : investing in quality teaching , 1997 .

[29]  Bradford Chaney The Accuracy of Teachers' Self-Reports on Their Postsecondary Education: Teacher Transcript Study, Schools and Staffing Survey. Working Paper Series. , 1994 .

[30]  The Status of Teaching as a Profession: 1990-91. Statistical Analysis Report. , 1997 .

[31]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Loosely Coupled Organizations Revisited. , 1991 .