Fuzzy clustering validity for contractor performance evaluation: Application to UAE contractors

Abstract Several statistical algorithms are used to categorize contractors. The number of categories depends on the clustering algorithm used. This paper presents a framework for classifying contractors using five of the most common clustering algorithms and assesses their performance with appropriate validity measures. The framework was implemented on actual data for 14 contractors working in UAE using a database of 294 projects. Quantitative measures were suggested and calculated for the contractors in the database. Qualitative measures were determined using AHP. The quality of contractor's staff and equipment was deemed to be the most important measure. The results show that contractors are grouped into four categories based on the quantitative and qualitative measures identified. The Fuzzy-C means algorithm had the highest validity measures when applied to the studied data set. The results show that the proposed framework can be used to categorize contractors into different performance groups in a rational and unbiased way.

[1]  Ekambaram Palaneeswaran,et al.  Recent advances and proposed improvements in contractor prequalification methodologies , 2001 .

[2]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  DECISION CRITERIA IN CONTRACTOR PREQUALIFICATION , 1988 .

[3]  Abdulaziz A. Bubshait,et al.  Contractor Prequalification in Saudi Arabia , 1996 .

[4]  Ekambaram Palaneeswaran,et al.  Contractor Selection for Design/Build Projects , 2000 .

[5]  Van Uu Nguyen,et al.  Tender evaluation by fuzzy sets , 1985 .

[6]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  PERFORMANCE MODELING FOR CONTRACTOR SELECTION , 2002 .

[7]  Robert L. K. Tiong,et al.  A Fuzzy Decision Framework for Contractor Selection , 2005 .

[8]  Weisheng Lu,et al.  A computer-aided decision support system for assessing a contractor's competitiveness , 2003 .

[9]  G. D. Holt,et al.  Applying multi-attribute analysis to contractor selection decisions , 1994 .

[10]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  EQUAL: a case-based contractor prequalifier , 2001 .

[11]  Tarek Zayed,et al.  Best-Value Model Based on Project Specific Characteristics , 2008 .

[12]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Criteria for contractor selection , 1997 .

[13]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[14]  Tiesong Hu,et al.  A fuzzy neural network approach for contractor prequalification , 2001 .

[15]  Chee Hong Wong,et al.  Contractor Performance Prediction Model for the United Kingdom Construction Contractor: Study of Logistic Regression Approach , 2004 .

[16]  Jeffrey S. Russell,et al.  QUALIFIER-1: CONTRACTOR PREQUALIFICATION MODEL , 1990 .

[17]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  An Expert System for Contractor Prequalification , 1988 .

[18]  Robert L. K. Tiong,et al.  Contractor Selection Criteria: Investigation of Opinions of Singapore Construction Practitioners , 2006 .

[19]  G. D. Holt,et al.  Factors influencing U.K. construction clients' choice of contractor , 1994 .

[20]  Yawei Li,et al.  Fuzzy Approach to Prequalifying Construction Contractors , 2007 .

[21]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Applying Evidential Reasoning to Prequalifying Construction Contractors , 2002 .

[22]  J. Bröchner,et al.  Price and Nonprice Criteria for Contractor Selection , 2006 .

[23]  Ashraf Elazouni.  Classifying construction contractors using unsupervised-learning neural networks , 2006 .

[24]  Y. Ilker Topcu,et al.  A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey , 2004 .

[25]  Min-Yuan Cheng,et al.  Evaluating sub-contractors performance using EFNIM , 2007 .