The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be-solved problems

In five experiments, we examined the time course of hemispheric differences in solution activation for insight-like problems. We propose that solving insight problems requires retrieval of unusual interpretations of problem elements, and that right-hemisphere (RH) coarse semantic coding is more likely than left-hemisphere (LH) fine semantic coding to maintain semantic activation of such interpretations. In four experiments, participants attempted word problems for 7 sec (Experiments 1A and 1B) or 2 sec (Experiments 2A and 2B), and 750 msec later responded to lateralized target words. After 7 sec of solving effort, Experiment 1A participants showed greater solution-related priming (i.e., they named solutions faster than unrelated words) for left visual field-RH (lvf-RH) targets than for right visual field-LH (rvf-LH) targets, and Experiment 1B participants made faster solution decisions on target words presented to the RH, as previously demonstrated following 15 sec of effort. After 2 sec of solving effort in Experiment 2A, women showed symmetric solution-related priming, although men showed a slight lvf-RH advantage in priming; and in Experiment 2B participants made equally quick solution decisions for targets presented to the LH and to the RH. In Experiment 3, participants viewed the problems for 1,250 msec then named lateralized target words; they showed symmetric solution-related priming. These experiments demonstrate solution activation initially in both hemispheres, but maintained solution activation only in the RH.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  The creative cognition approach. , 1995 .

[3]  H. Gardner,et al.  Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Language.

[4]  K. Luh,et al.  Interhemispheric Cooperation: Left Is Left and Right Is Right, but Sometimes the Twain Shall Meet , 1995 .

[5]  Victor A. Shames,et al.  Is there such a thing as implicit problem-solving? , 1994 .

[6]  R W Cox,et al.  Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes. Evidence from functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[8]  M. Koivisto.  Time course of semantic activation in the cerebral hemispheres , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  D. A. Robertson,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Cognitive Process of Mapping During Discourse Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[10]  C. Burgess,et al.  Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't … sometimes, some places , 1990, Brain and Language.

[11]  J. Grafman,et al.  Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Cerebral Mechanisms for Suppression of Inappropriate Information during Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Brain and Language.

[13]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[14]  R. E. Gur,et al.  Lateralized Increases in Cerebral Blood Flow during Performance of Verbal and Spatial Tasks: Relationship with Performance Level , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[15]  S E Petersen,et al.  Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  G. Regehr,et al.  Intuition in the context of discovery , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Right and Left Hemisphere Cooperation for Drawing Predictive and Coherence Inferences during Normal Story Comprehension , 2000, Brain and Language.

[18]  J. H. Neely,et al.  On the relation between feeling of knowing and lexical decision: persistent subthreshold activation or topic familiarity? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  J. Schooler,et al.  The ineffability of insight. , 1995 .

[20]  Edward M. Bowden.  The Effect of Reportable and Unreportable Hints on Anagram Solution and the Aha! Experience , 1997, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Sensitivity to lexical denotation and connotation in brain-damaged patients: A double dissociation? , 1984, Brain and Language.

[22]  Atsuko Nakagawa.  Role of Anterior and Posterior Attention Networks in Hemispheric Asymmetries during Lexical Decisions , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Beeman,et al.  Complementary Right- and Left-Hemisphere Language Comprehension , 1998 .

[24]  C. Burgess,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.

[25]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Time Course of Activating Brain Areas in Generating Verbal Associations , 1997 .

[28]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  J. Desmond,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for right-hemisphere involvement in processing unusual semantic relationships , 2000 .

[30]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Getting the Right Idea: Semantic Activation in the Right Hemisphere May Help Solve Insight Problems , 1998 .

[31]  M. Beeman.  Semantic Processing in the Right Hemisphere May Contribute to Drawing Inferences from Discourse , 1993, Brain and Language.

[32]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Hemispheric dissociation in judging semantic relations: Complementarity for close and distant associates , 1992, Brain and Language.

[33]  Debra Titone,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Context Sensitivity During Lexical Ambiguity Resolution , 1998, Brain and Language.

[34]  L. Katz,et al.  Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[36]  D E Meyer,et al.  Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Mark Beeman,et al.  Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. , 1998 .