A systems neurophysiology approach to voluntary event coding

Mechanisms responsible for the integration of perceptual events and appropriate actions (sensorimotor processes) have been subject to intense research. Different theoretical frameworks have been put forward with the "Theory of Event Coding (TEC)" being one of the most influential. In the current study, we focus on the concept of 'event files' within TEC and examine what sub-processes being dissociable by means of cognitive-neurophysiological methods are involved in voluntary event coding. This was combined with EEG source localization. We also introduce reward manipulations to delineate the neurophysiological sub-processes most relevant for performance variations during event coding. The results show that processes involved in voluntary event coding included predominantly stimulus categorization, feature unbinding and response selection, which were reflected by distinct neurophysiological processes (the P1, N2 and P3 ERPs). On a system's neurophysiological level, voluntary event-file coding is thus related to widely distributed parietal-medial frontal networks. Attentional selection processes (N1 ERP) turned out to be less important. Reward modulated stimulus categorization in parietal regions likely reflecting aspects of perceptual decision making but not in other processes. The perceptual categorization stage appears central for voluntary event-file coding.

[1]  B. Hommel,et al.  Evidence for a Role of the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Controlling Stimulus-response Integration: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Study , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[2]  Christian Beste,et al.  Response mode-dependent differences in neurofunctional networks during response inhibition: an EEG-beamforming study , 2016, Brain Structure and Function.

[3]  C. Beste,et al.  The system neurophysiological basis of backward inhibition , 2016, Brain Structure and Function.

[4]  B. Hommel,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Behavioural Brain Research Dopaminergic Modulation of the Updating of Stimulus–response Episodes in Parkinson's Disease , 2022 .

[5]  Wolfgang Klimesch,et al.  Evoked alpha and early access to the knowledge system: The P1 inhibition timing hypothesis , 2011, Brain Research.

[6]  Yvonne Höller,et al.  Functional similarities between the P1 component and alpha oscillations , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  M. Falkenstein,et al.  Variations in the TNF-α gene (TNF-α -308G→A) affect attention and action selection mechanisms in a dissociated fashion. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Economic Value Biases Uncertain Perceptual Choices in the Parietal and Prefrontal Cortices , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  Valerie Kirsch,et al.  Separating distinct aspects of the voluntary selection between response alternatives: N2- and P3-related BOLD responses , 2010, NeuroImage.

[10]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[11]  P. Falkai,et al.  Common and disease-specific dysfunctions of brain systems underlying attentional and executive control in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder , 2014, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Kelly,et al.  The classic P300 encodes a build‐to‐threshold decision variable , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  M. Sahani,et al.  Effects of Category-Specific Costs on Neural Systems for Perceptual Decision-Making , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Multidimensional rule, unidimensional rule, and similarity strategies in categorization: event-related brain potential correlates. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  J. Maunsell Neuronal representations of cognitive state: reward or attention? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Allen Azizian,et al.  Beware misleading cues: perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[17]  C. D. Frith,et al.  Brain Activations during Visual Search: Contributions of Search Efficiency versus Feature Binding , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  Elkan G. Akyürek,et al.  Adaptive control of event integration: evidence from event-related potentials. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The Neural Underpinnings of Event-file Management: Evidence for Stimulus-induced Activation of and Competition among Stimulus–Response Bindings , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  B. Hommel,et al.  Moderate alcohol consumption in humans impairs feature binding in visual perception but not across perception and action , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  B. Hommel,et al.  Dopamine, norepinephrine, and the management of sensorimotor bindings: individual differences in updating of stimulus–response episodes are predicted by DAT1, but not DBH5′-ins/del , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  B. Hommel Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding) , 2009, Psychological research.

[24]  C. Beste,et al.  Lateralization of spatial information processing in response monitoring , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[25]  B. Hommel Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. , 1982, Science.

[27]  W. Schultz Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  ERP—Correlates of response selection in a response conflict paradigm , 2008, Brain Research.

[29]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Linking Actions and Their Perceivable Consequences in the Human Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[30]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Enhancing cognitive control through neurofeedback: A role of gamma-band activity in managing episodic retrieval , 2010, NeuroImage.

[31]  E. Wascher,et al.  Attentional Capture by Irrelevant Transients Leads to Perceptual Errors in a Competitive Change Detection Task , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[32]  J Hohnsbein,et al.  Performance differences in reaction tasks are reflected in event-related brain potentials (ERPs). , 1998, Ergonomics.

[33]  Leonardo Fogassi,et al.  Neuronal Chains for Actions in the Parietal Lobe: A Computational Model , 2011, PloS one.

[34]  B. Hommel How much attention does an event file need? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[37]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  The right temporo-parietal junction contributes to visual feature binding , 2014, NeuroImage.

[39]  C. Beste,et al.  The importance of sensory integration processes for action cascading , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[40]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[41]  C. Beste,et al.  A causal role of the right inferior frontal cortex in implementing strategies for multi-component behaviour , 2015, Nature Communications.

[42]  Christian Beste,et al.  Age-related differences in task goal processing strategies during action cascading , 2015, Brain Structure and Function.

[43]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[44]  Michael L. Platt,et al.  Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[45]  E. Wascher,et al.  Tuning perceptual competition. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  C. Beste,et al.  Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindividual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction , 2005, NeuroImage.

[48]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Building Bridges between Perceptual and Economic Decision-Making: Neural and Computational Mechanisms , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[49]  Paul L. Nunez,et al.  A Visual study of surface potentials and Laplacians due to distributed neocortical sources: Computer simulations and evoked potentials , 2005, Brain Topography.

[50]  Christian Beste,et al.  DRD1 and DRD2 Genotypes Modulate Processing Modes of Goal Activation Processes during Action Cascading , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  R. Verleger,et al.  Reduction of P3b in patients with temporo-parietal lesions. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[52]  B. Hommel,et al.  Cannabis, cocaine, and visuomotor integration: Evidence for a role of dopamine D1 receptors in binding perception and action , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  R. Knight,et al.  Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[54]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[55]  Wolfgang Klimesch,et al.  Alpha phase coupling reflects object recognition , 2008, NeuroImage.

[56]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Visual Feature and Conjunction Searches of Equal Difficulty Engage Only Partially Overlapping Frontoparietal Networks , 2002, NeuroImage.

[57]  B. Hommel The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[58]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[59]  Christian Beste,et al.  Psychophysiological mechanisms underlying response selection in multidimensional space , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[60]  B. Hommel,et al.  Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration , 2004 .

[61]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[62]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception , 2005 .

[63]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 2001 .

[64]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[65]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Re-evaluating the Role of Tpj in Attentional Control: Contextual Updating? , 2022 .