The web structure of e-government - developing a methodology for quantitative evaluation

In this paper we describe preliminary work that examines whether statistical properties of the structure of websites can be an informative measure of their quality. We aim to develop a new method for evaluating e-government. E-government websites are evaluated regularly by consulting companies, international organizations and academic researchers using a variety of subjective measures. We aim to improve on these evaluations using a range of techniques from webmetric and social network analysis. To pilot our methodology, we examine the structure of government audit office sites in Canada, the USA, the UK, New Zealand and the Czech Republic.We report experimental values for a variety of characteristics, including the connected components, the average distance between nodes, the distribution of paths lengths, and the indegree and outdegree. These measures are expected to correlate with (i) the navigability of a website and (ii) with its "nodalityö which is a combination of hubness and authority. Comparison of websites based on these characteristics raised a number of issues, related to the proportion of non-hyperlinked content (e.g. pdf and doc files) within a site, and both the very significant differences in the size of the websites and their respective national populations. Methods to account for these issues are proposed and discussed.There appears to be some correlation between the values measured and the league tables reported in the literature. However, this multi dimensional analysis provides a richer source of evaluative techniques than previous work. Our analysis indicates that the US and Canada provide better navigability, much better than the UK; however, the UK site is shown to have the strongest "nodalityö on the Web.

[1]  Kevin S. McCurley,et al.  Locality, Hierarchy, and Bidirectionality in the Web∗ , 2003 .

[2]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Automatic Resource Compilation by Analyzing Hyperlink Structure and Associated Text , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[3]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[4]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[5]  E. Ettedgui,et al.  Benchmarking e-government in Europe and the US , 2003 .

[6]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Web crawling ethics revisited: Cost, privacy, and denial of service , 2006 .

[7]  Marco Gori,et al.  Focused Crawling Using Context Graphs , 2000, VLDB.

[8]  Kostas Tsioutsiouliklis,et al.  \Googlearchy": How a Few Heavily-Linked Sites Dominate Politics on the Web , 2003 .

[9]  C. Hood,et al.  The tools of government in the digital age , 2007 .

[10]  Gary William Flake,et al.  Self-organization of the web and identification of communities , 2002 .

[11]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Conceptualizing documentation on the Web: An evaluation of different heuristic-based models for counting links between university Web sites , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Shi Zhou,et al.  Accurately modeling the Internet topology , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The Web's hidden order , 2001, CACM.

[14]  H. Park.  Hyperlink network analysis: A new method for the study of social structure on the web , 2003 .

[15]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The calculation of web impact factors , 1998, J. Documentation.

[16]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[17]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web , 1999, Nature.

[18]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Inferring Web communities from link topology , 1998, HYPERTEXT '98.

[19]  Chris C. Demchak,et al.  Webbing governance: global trends across national-level public agencies , 2001, CACM.

[20]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Web crawling ethics revisited: Cost, privacy, and denial of service , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Linyuan Lu,et al.  The diameter of random massive graphs , 2001, SODA '01.

[22]  C. Hood.  The Tools of Government , 1983 .

[23]  原田 秀逸.  私の computer 環境 , 1998 .

[24]  Krishna Bharat,et al.  Who links to whom: mining linkage between Web sites , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[25]  Chris H. Q. Ding,et al.  Web document clustering using hyperlink structures , 2001, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[26]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Trawling the Web for Emerging Cyber-Communities , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[27]  Huberman,et al.  Strong regularities in world wide web surfing , 1998, Science.

[28]  D. Sornette,et al.  Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales , 1998, cond-mat/9801293.

[29]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Mining the Web's Link Structure , 1999, Computer.

[30]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Self-Organization and Identification of Web Communities , 2002, Computer.

[31]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[32]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[33]  D. West.  Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance , 2007 .