Adjacent Segment Degeneration Versus Disease After Lumbar Spine Fusion for Degenerative Pathology: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of the Literature.

STUDY DESIGN A systematic review. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to review the published literature to estimate rates and identify risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) and adjacent segment disease (ASDis) after lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Arthrodesis remains a common intervention for the surgical treatment of degenerative spinal disease. Clinical studies have demonstrated variability in the rates of adjacent segment pathology after lumbar fusion. METHODS This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Symptoms of ASDis were distinguished and defined by the need for a revision surgery procedure to address adjacent level pathology. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. Extracted data included average patient age, average time to follow-up, type of intervention, potential risk factors, and ASDeg and ASDis incidence. Funnel and forest plots were used to describe heterogeneity and meta-regression to estimate pooled incidence of ASDeg and ASDis. RESULTS A total of 31 articles with 4206 patients were included for analysis. Combining all extractable data, the overall pooled incidence of ASDeg was 5.9% per year (95% CI, 4.8%, 7.2%), and ASDis was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.3%, 2.4%) per year. The incidence of ASDeg is higher with more motion segments. Sex, age, segmental sagittal alignment, fusion methods, and instrumentation were not associated with an increased risk of ASDeg or ASDis. Radiographic ASDeg did not show strong correlation with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of ASDeg and ASDis has been variably reported in the literature, and fusion length is the factor most significantly associated with adjacent segment pathology. In guiding surgical strategies to avoid adjacent segment pathology, limiting the number of levels fused may have a greater impact than changes in fusion strategies.

[1]  S. Glassman,et al.  Changes in the Oswestry Disability Index that predict improvement after lumbar fusion. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  Wesley Hsu,et al.  Adjacent-Level Range of Motion and Intradiscal Pressure After Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fixation: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model , 2012, Spine.

[3]  T. Lund,et al.  Adjacent level disk disease--is it really a fusion disease? , 2011, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[4]  F. Girardi,et al.  Degenerative Scoliosis: A Review , 2011, HSS Journal ®.

[5]  I. Gelalis,et al.  Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2010, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[6]  James D. Kang,et al.  Debating the value of spine surgery. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  Jeffrey G Jarvik,et al.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. , 2010, JAMA.

[8]  P. Huh,et al.  Risk factors and surgical treatment for symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spine fusion. , 2009, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[9]  D. Togawa,et al.  Motion-preserving Surgery Can Prevent Early Breakdown of Adjacent Segments: Comparison of Posterior Dynamic Stabilization With Spinal Fusion , 2009, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[10]  D. Ishimaru,et al.  Sublaminar wiring stabilization to prevent adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion , 2009, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[11]  H. Möller,et al.  A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[12]  D. Chin,et al.  Accelerated L5-S1 Segment Degeneration after Spinal Fusion on and above L4-5 : Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up Results. , 2009, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[13]  Sang-Ho Lee,et al.  Single-level instrumented mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[14]  C. Niu,et al.  Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis , 2008, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[15]  John R. Johnson,et al.  Sagittal alignment as a risk factor for adjacent level degeneration: a case-control study. , 2008, Orthopedics.

[16]  A. Disch,et al.  Higher Risk of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Floating Fusions: Long-Term Outcome After Low Lumbar Spine Fusions , 2008, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[17]  Choon-Sung Lee,et al.  Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[18]  J. Lee,et al.  The Impact of Adjacent Segment Degeneration on the Clinical Outcome After Lumbar Spinal Fusion , 2008, Spine.

[19]  Yongjung Kim,et al.  Adjacent Segment Disease FollowingLumbar/Thoracolumbar Fusion With Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up , 2007, Spine.

[20]  Jun-Hong Min,et al.  Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[21]  E. Wai,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging 20 Years After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2006, Spine.

[22]  Motoki Iwasaki,et al.  Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[23]  T. Takebayashi,et al.  Adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusion requiring second operation , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[24]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  Alf Nachemson,et al.  Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  D. Spengler,et al.  The Impact of Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration on Health Status Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion , 2003, Spine.

[27]  Philippe Gillet,et al.  The Fate of the Adjacent Motion Segments After Lumbar Fusion , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[28]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  L5–S1 Segment Survivorship and Clinical Outcome Analysis After L4–L5 Isolated Fusion , 2003, Spine.

[29]  W. Lo,et al.  Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[30]  M. Blauth,et al.  Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: a biomechanical study , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[31]  H. Matsui,et al.  Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. , 2001, Journal of spinal disorders.

[32]  Malhar N. Kumar,et al.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[33]  G. Carlson,et al.  Results of surgery for spinal stenosis adjacent to previous lumbar fusion. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[34]  Y. Shimada,et al.  Outcome of One-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Postoperative Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Adjacent to the Fusion , 2000, Spine.

[35]  L. Lenke,et al.  Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. , 1999, Spine.

[36]  C. Wimmer,et al.  AP-translation in the proximal disc adjacent to lumbar spine fusion. A retrospective comparison of mono- and polysegmental fusion in 120 patients. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[37]  M. Rahm,et al.  Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. , 1996, Journal of spinal disorders.

[38]  John H. Evans,et al.  Effects of Short Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Biomechanics of Neighboring Unfused Segments , 1996, Spine.

[39]  O. Böstman,et al.  Posterolateral lumbosacral fusion with transpedicular fixation: 63 consecutive cases followed for 4 (2-6) years. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[40]  K. Kumano,et al.  Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. , 1995, Journal of spinal disorders.

[41]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain , 2017, AL-QADISIYAH MEDICAL JOURNAL.

[42]  J L Lewis,et al.  The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion. , 1993, Spine.

[43]  Casey K. Lee,et al.  Biomechanics of Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion in Combined Compression-Torsion Loads , 1986, Spine.

[44]  J. K. Hofer,et al.  A minimum 5-year follow-up of an oxidized zirconium femoral prosthesis used for total knee arthroplasty. , 2014, The Knee.

[45]  P. Tugwell,et al.  The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses , 2014 .

[46]  P. Rommens,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion. , 2011, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.

[47]  I. Kim,et al.  Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration Following Posterior Lumbar Arthrodesis: Retrospective Analysis of 26 Patients Experienced in 10-year of Periods. , 2007 .

[48]  N. Osada,et al.  Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360 degrees fusion. , 2007, European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society.

[49]  B. Min,et al.  Predictable Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Lumbar Fusion. , 2007 .

[50]  D. Sackett.  Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM: 2nd ed , 2000 .