Anomalous Strength Characteristics of Tilt Grain Boundaries in Graphene

Perfect Imperfections Graphene is composed of six-atom rings, but will include a number of five- and seven-atom rings as defects. Using simulations, Grantab et al. (p. 946) show that more defects do not necessarily lead to greater deterioration of mechanical properties. Mismatches caused by differences in the orientation of neighboring crystals are divided into low- and high-angle grain boundaries, and typically it is the lower-angle boundaries that are stronger. In graphene, by contrast, the larger-angle boundaries, which consist of higher-defect densities, are better able to accommodate the strain and prevent failure that originates in the breakup of the seven-member graphene rings. This suggests ways for synthesizing imperfect graphene sheets that will have mechanical properties that are close to those of perfect graphene. Simulations indicate that high-angle boundaries can better accommodate strain and prevent failure in graphene. Graphene in its pristine form is one of the strongest materials tested, but defects influence its strength. Using atomistic calculations, we find that, counter to standard reasoning, graphene sheets with large-angle tilt boundaries that have a high density of defects are as strong as the pristine material and, unexpectedly, are much stronger than those with low-angle boundaries having fewer defects. We show that this trend is not explained by continuum fracture models but can be understood by considering the critical bonds in the strained seven-membered carbon rings that lead to failure; the large-angle boundaries are stronger because they are able to better accommodate these strained rings. Our results provide guidelines for designing growth methods to obtain sheets with strengths close to that of pristine graphene.

[1]  H. Häkkinen,et al.  Structural, chemical, and dynamical trends in graphene grain boundaries , 2010 .

[2]  Steven G. Louie,et al.  Topological defects in graphene: Dislocations and grain boundaries , 2010, 1004.2031.

[3]  Yong-Wei Zhang,et al.  A molecular dynamics study of the mechanical properties of hydrogen functionalized graphene , 2010 .

[4]  J. Gillespie,et al.  Tensile behaviors of graphene sheets and carbon nanotubes with multiple Stone–Wales defects , 2010 .

[5]  C. Durkan,et al.  Tailoring the local interaction between graphene layers in graphite at the atomic scale and above using scanning tunneling microscopy. , 2009, ACS nano.

[6]  Jiwoong Park,et al.  Transfer-free batch fabrication of single layer graphene transistors. , 2009, Nano letters.

[7]  M. Katsnelson,et al.  Room-temperature ferromagnetism in graphite driven by two-dimensional networks of point defects , 2009, 0910.2130.

[8]  SUPARNA DUTTASINHA,et al.  Graphene: Status and Prospects , 2009, Science.

[9]  S. Banerjee,et al.  Large-Area Synthesis of High-Quality and Uniform Graphene Films on Copper Foils , 2009, Science.

[10]  J. Gillespie,et al.  Fracture and progressive failure of defective graphene sheets and carbon nanotubes , 2009 .

[11]  Kwang S. Kim,et al.  Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes , 2009, Nature.

[12]  C. Flipse,et al.  Structural and electronic properties of grain boundaries in graphite : planes of periodically distributed point defects , 2008, 0810.5653.

[13]  J. Kysar,et al.  Measurement of the Elastic Properties and Intrinsic Strength of Monolayer Graphene , 2008, Science.

[14]  S. Pei,et al.  Graphene segregated on Ni surfaces and transferred to insulators , 2008, 0804.1778.

[15]  B. Yakobson,et al.  Dislocation dynamics in multiwalled carbon nanotubes at high temperatures. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[16]  Andre K. Geim,et al.  The rise of graphene. , 2007, Nature materials.

[17]  J. Bendall,et al.  Observation and investigation of graphite superlattice boundaries by scanning tunneling microscopy , 2007 .

[18]  P. Sharma,et al.  An atomistic and non-classical continuum field theoretic perspective of elastic interactions between defects (force dipoles) of various symmetries and application to graphene , 2006 .

[19]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Continuum field model of defect formation in carbon nanotubes , 2005 .

[20]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Mechanics of defects in carbon nanotubes: Atomistic and multiscale simulations , 2005 .

[21]  B. Bhattacharya,et al.  Effect of randomly occurring Stone–Wales defects on mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes using atomistic simulation , 2005, 1507.07857.

[22]  S. Iijima,et al.  Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers , 2004, Nature.

[23]  Y. Gan,et al.  STM investigation on interaction between superstructure and grain boundary in graphite , 2003 .

[24]  P. Lambin,et al.  STM study of a grain boundary in graphite , 2002 .

[25]  Paolo Ruggerone,et al.  Computational Materials Science X , 2002 .

[26]  K. Broberg Cracks and Fracture , 1999 .

[27]  I. Shvets,et al.  Bulk defects in graphite observed with a scanning tunnelling microscope , 1998 .

[28]  Physical Review Letters 63 , 1989 .

[29]  C. Quate,et al.  Observation of tilt boundaries in graphite by scanning tunneling microscopy and associated multiple tip effects , 1988 .

[30]  Haimin Yao,et al.  Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , 2014 .