Distributed facilitation: a concept whose time has come?

Group facilitation is a dynamic process that involves managing relationships between people, tasks and technology, as well as structuring tasks and contributing to the effective accomplishment of the meetings outcomes. This is a difficult problem that becomes even more difficult as group work is geographically distributed. This paper provides a comprehensive framework, in the form of a meeting model, that defines the many activities that surround group work. We show that in existing systems support for facilitation is low and based on the level of facilitator control, we identify facilitation functions and suggest a rational for prioritizing them. With this in hand, we are designing and implementing a prototype facilitation system to support group activities in a distributed environment.

[1]  C. H. Kriebel Management information systems , 1970, ACM '70.

[2]  A Jay,et al.  How to: Run a Meeting , 1982, The Journal of nursing administration.

[3]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[4]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  Facilitation of Group Communication , 1989 .

[5]  Joseph C. Chilberg A Review of Group Process Designs for Facilitating Communication in Problem-Solving Groups , 1989 .

[6]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[7]  C. Pollard,et al.  Group support system product comparisons , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  James A. Waters,et al.  Group Facilitation Skills for Managers , 1988 .

[9]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams , 1988 .

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Using Two Different Electronic Meeting System Tools for the Same Task: An Experimental Comparison , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Issues and experiences designing and implementing two group drawing tools , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Integrating expert systems with group decision support systems , 1991, TOIS.

[13]  G. L. Rein,et al.  A group mood meter , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[15]  Ramana Rao,et al.  Semi-structured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination , 1986, CSCW '86.

[16]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Object lens: a “spreadsheet” for cooperative work , 2018, TOIS.

[17]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[18]  John Keltner,et al.  Facilitation Catalyst for Group Problem Solving , 1989 .

[19]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  Using trained "developmental" discussion leaders to improve further the quality of group decisions. , 1960 .

[20]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Leading Business Teams: How Teams Can Use Technology and Group Process Tools to Enhance Performance , 1991 .

[21]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Groupware: some issues and experiences , 1991, CACM.

[22]  Paul Scott,et al.  User interface requirements for face to face groupware , 1990, CHI '90.

[23]  P. Friedman,et al.  Upstream Facilitation , 1989 .

[24]  M. O. Pendergast A distributed object-oriented environment for EMS application development , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  Terry Winograd,et al.  A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work , 1987, SGCH.

[26]  Harold Thimbleby,et al.  A reflexive perspective of CSCW , 1991, SGCH.

[27]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion , 1988, CSCW '88.

[28]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  An experimental test of the effects of "developmental" vs. "free" discussions on the quality of group decisions. , 1957 .