Reliable nonlinear hybrid simulation using modified operator splitting technique

[1]  Guoshan Xu,et al.  Operator‐splitting method for real‐time substructure testing , 2006 .

[2]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Application of Pseudodynamic Test Method to Structural Research , 1996 .

[3]  Shuenn-Yih Chang,et al.  Explicit Pseudodynamic Algorithm with Unconditional Stability , 2002 .

[4]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Real-Time Error Monitoring for Hybrid Simulation. Part I: Methodology and Experimental Verification , 2007 .

[5]  M. Nakashima,et al.  Japanese Activities on On‐Line Testing , 1987 .

[6]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real‐time hybrid structural simulation , 2008 .

[7]  Pui-Shum B. Shing,et al.  Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests , 1991 .

[8]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development of real‐time pseudo dynamic testing , 1992 .

[9]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Online energy-based error indicator for the assessment of numerical and experimental errors in a hybrid simulation , 2009 .

[10]  M. Ahmadizadeh,et al.  Real-time seismic hybrid simulation procedures for reliable structural performance testing , 2007 .

[11]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Integration Techniques for Substructure Pseudo Dynamic Test , 1990 .

[12]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Full operator algorithm for hybrid simulation , 2009 .

[13]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  A method for estimating specimen tangent stiffness for hybrid simulation , 2009 .

[14]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Hybrid Simulation with Improved Operator-Splitting Integration Using Experimental Tangent Stiffness Matrix Estimation , 2008 .

[15]  Oreste S. Bursi,et al.  Linearly Implicit Time Integration Methods for Real-Time Dynamic Substructure Testing , 2010 .

[16]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Iterative implicit integration procedure for hybrid simulation of large nonlinear structures , 2011 .

[17]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Pseudodynamic Method for Seismic Testing , 1985 .

[18]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[19]  Georges Magonette.  Development and application of large–scale continuous pseudo–dynamic testing techniques , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Event-Driven Control System for Geographically Distributed Hybrid Simulation , 2006 .

[21]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Equivalent force control combined with adaptive polynomial‐based forward prediction for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2017 .

[22]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Combined implicit or explicit integration steps for hybrid simulation , 2007 .

[23]  O. Mercan,et al.  Real‐time hybrid testing using the unconditionally stable explicit CR integration algorithm , 2009 .

[24]  Chung-Chan Hung,et al.  An unconditionally stable algorithm with the capability of restraining the influence of actuator control errors in hybrid simulation , 2012 .

[25]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems , 1999 .

[26]  Shuenn-Yih Chang,et al.  An explicit structure-dependent algorithm for pseudodynamic testing , 2013 .

[27]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Pseudodynamic Test Method—Current Status and Future Directions , 1989 .

[28]  Shuenn-Yih Chang,et al.  Improved Explicit Method for Structural Dynamics , 2007 .

[29]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development, potential, and limitations of real–time online (pseudo–dynamic) testing , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[30]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Real-Time Error Monitoring for Hybrid Simulation. Part II: Structural Response Modification due to Errors , 2007 .

[31]  A A Tasnimi,et al.  A new integration scheme for application to seismic hybrid simulation , 2017, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.