Evaluation of the Quality of Irrigation Machinery by Monitoring Changes in the Coefficients of Uniformity and Non-Uniformity of Irrigation

Recently, the development of agricultural technology has been focused on achieving higher reliability and quality of work. The aim of the presented paper was to examine the possibilities of evaluating the quality of work of wide-area irrigation machinery by monitoring the coefficients of uniformity and non-uniformity of irrigation. The object of the research was pivot irrigation machinery equipped with sprinklers with a total length from 230 to 540 m. The commonly applied quality of work parameter for wide-range irrigators is the irrigation uniformity coefficient according to Heermann and Hein CUH. Work quality evaluations were also carried out through other parameters applicable in practice, such as irrigation uniformity coefficients calculated according to Christiansen CU, Wilcox and Swailes Cws, and our introduced parameters, the coefficient ar (derived from the degree of unevenness according to Oehler) and the degree of uniformity γr (derived from the degree of non-uniformity according to Voight). Other applied parameters for determining the quality of work of wide-range irrigation machinery were the coefficients of irrigation uniformity according to Hart and Reynolds CUhr, further according to Criddle CUcr and subsequently according to Beale and Howell CUbr. Next, the parameters of the non-uniformity coefficient according to Oehler a, the coefficient of variation according to Stefanelli Cv, the degree of non-uniformity according to Voigt γ and the degree of non-uniformity according to Hofmeister Ef were evaluated. Field tests were performed during the growing season of cultivated crops (potatoes, corn and sugar beet) in the village of Trakovice (agricultural enterprise SLOV-MART, southwest of the Slovakia) and in the district of Piešťany (Agrobiop, joint stock company). During the research, the inlet operating parameters (speed stage, inlet pressure, irrigation dose), technical parameters (number of sprayers, total length, number of chassis) and weather conditions (wind speed and temperature) were recorded. The obtained results were examined by one-way ANOVA analysis depending on the observed coefficient or input conditions and subsequently verified by Tukey and Duncan tests as needed. Irrigation uniformity values ranged from 67.58% (Cws) to 95.88% (CUbh) depending on the input conditions. Irrigation non-uniformity values ranged from 8.58 (a, Ef) to 32.42% (Cv). The results indicate a statistically significant effect of the site of interest and thus the impact of particular field conditions (p < 0.05). When evaluating the application of different coefficients of irrigation uniformity, the results showed a statistically significant effect only in the first test (p = 0.03, p < 0.05). During further repeated measurements, the quality of work increased due to the performed inspection of all sprayers and the reduction in the influence of the wind.

[1]  Production of drip irrigated squash (Cucurbita Pepo, L.) under different levels of irrigation and uniformity , 2021 .

[2]  Eisa Maroufpoor,et al.  Evaluation of uniformity coefficients for sprinkler irrigation systems under different field conditions in Kurdistan Province (northwest of Iran). , 2018 .

[4]  Jiusheng Li,et al.  Sprinkler water distributions as affected by winter wheat canopy , 2000, Irrigation Science.

[5]  Ayman El Sabagh,et al.  SPRINKLER IRRIGATION UNIFORMITY AND CROP WATER PRODUCTIVITY OF BARLEY IN ARID REGION , 2015 .

[6]  Enrique Playán,et al.  Analysis of an irrigation district in northeastern Spain: I. Characterisation and water use assessment , 2003 .

[7]  J. C. Wilcox,et al.  Uniformity of Water Distribution by Some Undertree Orchard Sprinklers1 , 2016 .

[8]  Jiusheng Li,et al.  Crop Yield as Affected by Uniformity of Sprinkler Irrigation System , 1998 .

[9]  M. Porfiri,et al.  Fluorescent particle tracers in surface hydrology: a proof of concept in a semi-natural hillslope , 2012 .

[10]  Artificial neural network model for simulation of water distribution in sprinkle irrigation , 2015 .

[11]  M. Cecconi,et al.  Hillslope Erosion Mitigation: An Experimental Proof of a Nature-Based Solution , 2021, Sustainability.

[12]  Luciano Mateos,et al.  Soil management and traffic effects on infiltration of irrigation water applied using sprinklers , 2011, Irrigation Science.

[13]  Haijun Yan,et al.  Water distributions of low-pressure sprinklers as affected by the maize canopy under a centre pivot irrigation system , 2020 .

[14]  Wm. E. Hart,et al.  Analytical Design of Sprinkler Systems , 1965 .

[15]  J. Jobbágy,et al.  DESIGN AND TESTING OF DEVICE FOR MEASURING THE LONGITUDINAL UNIFORMITY OF REEL HOSE IRRIGATION MACHINE , 2013 .

[16]  D. C. Kincaid,et al.  Drop Size Distributions for Irrigation Sprinklers , 1996 .

[17]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Identifying Advantages and Disadvantages of Variable Rate Irrigation: An Updated Review , 2019, Applied Engineering in Agriculture.

[18]  Ken Solomon.  Variability of Sprinkler Coefficient of Uniformity Test Results , 1979 .

[19]  L. TomaÌ sÌŒik,et al.  Optimization of Irrigation Spray Distribution in the Term of its Uniformity , 2013 .

[20]  R. Topak,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Sprinkler Irrigation in a Semi-arid Area , 2005 .

[21]  David T. Howell,et al.  Relationships Among Sprinkler Uniformity Measures , 1966 .

[22]  J. Jobbágy,et al.  Evaluation of the coefficient of uniformity and non-uniformity of irrigation for wide-range irrigators in various field conditions , 2018 .