Acute expansion of nitinol-based self-expandable device in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation

Background The acute adaptation of the nitinol-based stent frame self expandable valve to the aortic root after deployment is poorly understood. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the occurrence, degree and determinants of acute adaptation of the nitinol-based stent frame self-expandable valves after implantation. Methods This is a single-site prospective registry including patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a widely used second-generation nitinol-based self-expandable device (Evolut R, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). We measured valve diameters at three different sections: distal (aortic) level, central (annulus) level and proximal (ventricular) level. Valve expansion was estimated by the difference between the diameters calculated immediately after valve deployment (A) and at the end of the procedure (B). The absolute and relative stent changes were defined as B-A and (B-A)/B∗100, respectively. A linear regression model was performed to test the association between the degree of valve extension at each segment with baseline and procedural characteristics. Results A total of 58 consecutive TAVR patients were included in this analysis, with a mean age of 82.12 ± 5.28 years. Out of the total, 46% of the patients had chronic kidney disease, 32% had diabetes and 76% had dyslipidaemia. The mean procedural time was 28.11 ± 11.6 min, with 53.45% of predilation. Postdilation was performed only in 3.5% of patients. Final stent diameters were significantly higher than those achieved immediately after valve implantation – an observation that was consistent for all the segments: 0.50 ± 0.51 mm and 2.48 ± 2.57% (P < 0.01) in the proximal, 0.46 ± 0.57 mm and 2.39 ± 2.96% (P < 0.01) in the central, as well as 0.58 ± 0.59 mm and 2.14 ± 2.14% (P < 0.01) at the distal segments. Postdilation significantly affected the expansion of the central segment, and, albeit not significantly, the proximal one, while no changes were observed for the distal portion of the platform. Conclusion This is the first study to have documented a significant degree of the Evolut R self-expandable valve expansion after deployment. However, further studies are required to assess the short- and long-term time course of self-expandable valve enlargement and the clinical relevance of this finding.

[1]  M. Metra,et al.  Prognostic value of right ventricle to pulmonary artery coupling in transcatheter aortic valve implantation recipients , 2022, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[2]  C. Trani,et al.  Predictors of early discharge after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insight from the CoreValve ClinicalService , 2022, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[3]  F. Fedele,et al.  Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory response syndrome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation , 2022, Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine.

[4]  B. Prendergast,et al.  2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. , 2021, European heart journal.

[5]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  Computed tomography measured psoas muscle attenuation predicts mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2021, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[6]  L. Pugliese,et al.  Relationship between septo-valvular angle and risk of pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a preliminary study , 2021, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[7]  M. Mack,et al.  2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  M. Miccoli,et al.  Threshold for calcium volume evaluation in patients with aortic valve stenosis: correlation with Agatston score. , 2020, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[9]  P. Lamelas,et al.  TAVR prosthesis recoil: Unknowns and implications , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[10]  S. Kapadia,et al.  Comparison of acute recoil after valve deployment and after post‐dilation in patients undergoing transfemoral‐transcatheter aortic valve replacement with SAPIEN‐3 valve , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[11]  A. Curcio,et al.  Will transcatheter aortic valve implantation represent the choice treatment for all patients who need a biological valve? , 2020, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[12]  C. Indolfi,et al.  Standard Versus Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Femoral Artery in Patients Undergoing Invasive Procedures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[13]  C. Indolfi,et al.  Updated clinical indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: expert opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology and GISE , 2018, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[14]  M. Taguri,et al.  Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asian Patients: The OCEAN-TAVI Registry. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  G. Dangas,et al.  Antithrombotic Treatment after Transcatheter Heart Valves Implant , 2018, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis.

[16]  C. Indolfi,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients at intermediate surgical risk. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[17]  G. Pulignano,et al.  ANMCO/SIC/SICI-GISE/SICCH Executive Summary of Consensus Document on Risk Stratification in elderly patients with aortic stenosis before surgery or transcatheter aortic valve replacement , 2017, European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Comparison of acute elastic recoil between the SAPIEN‐XT and SAPIEN valves in transfemoral–transcatheter aortic valve replacement , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[19]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Incidence, predictive factors and haemodynamic consequences of acute stent recoil following transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve. , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  Ming Li,et al.  Self-Expanding Stent and Delivery System for Aortic Valve Replacement. , 2012, Journal of medical devices.

[21]  Nico Mollet,et al.  Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  M. Ruel,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes After Valve Replacement for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch , 2006, Circulation.

[24]  S. Shabalovskaya,et al.  On the nature of the biocompatibility and on medical applications of NiTi shape memory and superelastic alloys. , 1996, Bio-medical materials and engineering.