Against the odds: what to expect in rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury with a neurologically controlled Hybrid Assistive Limb exoskeleton. A subgroup analysis of 55 patients according to age and lesion level.

Objective Age and lesion level are believed to represent outcome predictors in rehabilitation of patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) exoskeleton enables patients to perform a voluntary controlled gait pattern via an electromyography-triggered neuromuscular feedback system, and has been introduced as a temporary gait training tool in patients with SCI. The aim of this prospective pre- and postintervention study was to examine functional outcomes as a function of age and lesion level in patients with chronic incomplete SCI (iSCI) or chronic complete SCI (cSCI) with zones of partial preservation (ZPP) by using the HAL as a temporary training tool. Methods Fifty-five participants with chronic iSCI or cSCI (mean time since injury 6.85 ± 5.12 years) were classified according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) and divided by age (< 50 or ≥ 50 years), independent of lesion level, and also into 4 homogeneous groups according to lesion level. The subgroups were as follows: Subgroup 1, tetraplegic iSCI (n = 13) (C2-8, AIS C [n = 8] and AIS D [n = 5]); Subgroup 2, paraplegic iSCI with spastic motor behavior (n = 15) (T2-12, AIS C [n = 8] and AIS D [n = 7]); Subgroup 3, paraplegic cSCI with complete motor paraplegia and absence of spastic motor behavior (n = 18) (T11-L4 [AIS A], and ZPP from L-3 to S-1); and Subgroup 4, paraplegic iSCI with absence of spastic motor behavior (n = 9) (T12-L3, AIS C [n = 8] and AIS D [n = 1]). The training paradigm consisted of 12 weeks of HAL-assisted treadmill training (5 times/week). Baseline status was documented prior to intervention by using the AIS grade, Walking Index for SCI II (WISCI II) score, the 10-meter walk test (10MWT), and the 6-minute walk test (6MinWT). Training effects were assessed after 6 and 12 weeks of therapy, without HAL assistance. Results Overall, a time reduction of 47% in the 10MWT, self-selected speed (10MWTsss) (< 50 years = 56% vs ≥ 50 years = 37%) and an increase of 50% in the 6MinWT were documented. The WISCI II scores showed a mean gain of 1.69 levels. At the end of the study, 24 of 55 patients (43.6%) were less dependent on walking aids. Age had a nonsignificant negative influence on the 10MWTsss. Despite a few nonsignificant subgroup differences, participants improved across all tests. Namely, patients with iSCI who had spastic motor behavior improved to a nonsignificant, lesser extent in the 6MinWT. Conclusions The HAL-assisted treadmill training leads to functional improvements in chronic iSCI or cSCI, both in and out of the exoskeleton. An improvement of approximately 50% in the 10MWTsss and in gait endurance (6MinWT) can be expected from such training. The influences of SCI lesion level and age on functional outcome were nonsignificant in the present study. Older age (≥ 50 years) may be associated with smaller improvements in the 10MWTsss. An iSCI in paraplegic patients with spastic motor behavior may be a nonsignificant negative predictor in gait endurance improvements. Clinical trial registration no.: DRKS00010250 ( https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de/drks_web/setLocale_DE.do ).

[1]  V. Dietz,et al.  Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[2]  K G Pearson,et al.  Neural adaptation in the generation of rhythmic behavior. , 2000, Annual review of physiology.

[3]  D. Backus,et al.  Relationship of physical therapy inpatient rehabilitation interventions and patient characteristics to outcomes following spinal cord injury: The SCIRehab project , 2012, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[4]  P. London Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[5]  R. Waters,et al.  Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from standards of the American Spinal Injury Association. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Christie K. Ferreira,et al.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study , 2011, The Lancet.

[7]  J. Krakauer Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[8]  V. Dietz,et al.  Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[9]  Exoskelette in der Rehabilitation Querschnittgelähmter , 2015, Der Unfallchirurg.

[10]  Fiona Moffat,et al.  Effects of locomotor training after incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  R. Waters,et al.  Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Jaynie F. Yang,et al.  Interlimb coordination in rhythmic leg movements: spontaneous and training-induced manifestations in human infants. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Lemay,et al.  Role of spared pathways in locomotor recovery after body-weight-supported treadmill training in contused rats. , 2011, Journal of neurotrauma.

[14]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  M. Knikou,et al.  Locomotor training improves premotoneuronal control after chronic spinal cord injury. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  John F. Ditunno,et al.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision. , 2001 .

[17]  G Colombo,et al.  Locomotor pattern in paraplegic patients: training effects and recovery of spinal cord function , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[18]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Recovery from a spinal cord injury: significance of compensation, neural plasticity, and repair. , 2008, Journal of neurotrauma.

[19]  R. Waters,et al.  International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[20]  V. Janda,et al.  Muscle Function Testing , 1983 .

[21]  Yasuhisa Hasegawa,et al.  Intention-based walking support for paraplegia patients with Robot Suit HAL , 2007, Adv. Robotics.

[22]  D. Wade,et al.  Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  J. Wolpaw The education and re-education of the spinal cord. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[24]  S. Grillner,et al.  How detailed is the central pattern generation for locomotion? , 1975, Brain Research.

[25]  V. Dietz,et al.  Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Mirko Aach,et al.  The Effectiveness and Safety of Exoskeletons as Assistive and Rehabilitation Devices in the Treatment of Neurologic Gait Disorders in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review , 2016, Global spine journal.

[27]  Martin Tegenthoff,et al.  HAL® exoskeleton training improves walking parameters and normalizes cortical excitability in primary somatosensory cortex in spinal cord injury patients , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[28]  V. Dietz,et al.  Walking During Daily Life Can Be Validly and Responsively Assessed in Subjects With a Spinal Cord Injury , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[29]  Janice J Eng,et al.  A systematic review of the efficacy of gait rehabilitation strategies for spinal cord injury. , 2007, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[30]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[31]  William Zev Rymer,et al.  Locomotor training alters the behavior of flexor reflexes during walking in human spinal cord injury. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Martin Tegenthoff,et al.  Locomotion training using voluntary driven exoskeleton (HAL) in acute incomplete SCI , 2014, Neurology.

[33]  R. Firth Function , 1955, Yearbook of Anthropology.

[34]  P. Schwenkreis,et al.  Voluntary driven exoskeleton as a new tool for rehabilitation in chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot study. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[35]  J. Fawcett,et al.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures , 2007, Spinal Cord.

[36]  [Exoskeletons for rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries. Options and limitations]. , 2015, Der Unfallchirurg.

[37]  M. Dimitrijevic,et al.  Evidence for a Spinal Central Pattern Generator in Humans a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[38]  V. Dietz,et al.  Neurological aspects of spinal-cord repair: promises and challenges , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[39]  Sue Ann Sisto,et al.  Locomotor training: as a treatment of spinal cord injury and in the progression of neurologic rehabilitation. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[40]  Kristin E Musselman,et al.  Loading the limb during rhythmic leg movements lengthens the duration of both flexion and extension in human infants. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  V. Dietz,et al.  Standardized assessment of walking capacity after spinal cord injury: the European network approach , 2008, Neurological research.

[42]  Nerys Brick,et al.  Locomotor training for walking after spinal cord injury. , 2014, Orthopedic nursing.

[43]  J. Piepmeier,et al.  Late neurological changes following traumatic spinal cord injury. , 1988, Journal of neurosurgery.

[44]  Ross Querry,et al.  Robotic orthoses for body weight-supported treadmill training. , 2006, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.