Optimizing Acquisition Geometry in Shallow Gas Cloud Using Particle Swarm Optimization Approach

Many hydrocarbon explorations in mature fields have been severely affected by complex and overburdening issues, such as shallow gas accumulation, gas pockets, and gas seepage. In this work, a new forward modelling technique is proposed in evaluating the potential survey design for fields affected by shallow gas cloud. In recent years, the implementation of innovative acquisition layouts has been producing significantly better seismic images, especially in the low illumination subsurface area. However, the uncertainty of the effectiveness in new acquisition design subsurface coverage always become a major stumbling block. To overcome this constraint, an optimization approach is suggested through the smart source and receiver location arrangement on the surface, with significant alignment to the conventional source and receiver arrangement approach. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) method is used to find the source-receiver configuration with maximum subsurface illumination coverage for the gas affected field situated in Malaysia Basin. Implementation of the PSO algorithm requires both a velocity model building process and wave field extrapolation from a target reflector to the surface level. The wave field data then was used to simulate receiver optimization outputs which eventually determined the subsurface illumination coverage. The results from the new optimization method for both synthetic model and Malaysia Basin data, offer a greater understanding of the consequences of obstacles caused by shallow anomalies with respect to seismic acquisition, data processing, and interpretation.

[1]  Albert A. Groenwold,et al.  A Study of Global Optimization Using Particle Swarms , 2005, J. Glob. Optim..

[3]  Gerrit Blacquière,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of seismic acquisition geometries by focal beams—Part I: Theoretical considerations , 2001 .

[4]  Gijs J. O. Vermeer Seismic Wavefield Sampling: A Wave Number Approach to Acquisition Fundamentals , 1990 .

[5]  J. Onwunalu Optimization of field development using particle swarmoptimization and new well pattern descriptions , 2010 .

[6]  Xianhai Song,et al.  Application of particle swarm optimization to interpret Rayleigh wave dispersion curves , 2012 .

[7]  Andries Petrus Engelbrecht,et al.  Unified particle swarm optimizer: Convergence analysis , 2016, 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[8]  Vincenzo Lipari,et al.  Particle swarm optimization for seismic velocity analysis , 2013 .

[9]  Ioan Cristian Trelea,et al.  The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection , 2003, Inf. Process. Lett..

[10]  Yongfeng Zhu,et al.  Particle swarm optimization and its application to seismic inversion of igneous rocks , 2017 .

[11]  Gerrit Blacquière,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of seismic acquisition geometries by focal beams—Part II: Practical aspects and examples , 2001 .

[12]  Duan Yu-hong A New Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm , 2011 .

[13]  Rasoul Hamidzadeh Moghadam,et al.  Inversion seismic refraction data using particle swarm optimization: a case study of Tabriz, Iran , 2015, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[14]  R. Eberhart,et al.  Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).