Strategy for spatial simulation of co‐rotating vortices

The present numerical study is motivated by the challenge to simulate the three-dimensional spatial dynamics of a co-rotating vortex system, through the development of an elliptic instability (C. R. Phys. 2005; 6(4–5):431–450) using a high-order solver of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. This phenomenon was studied previously only by temporal simulations. The interest of spatial simulation is first to analyse the effect of the axial velocity on the merging process, which are neglected with the temporal approach, and to study interaction with jet flows. The numerical problem is the choice of boundary conditions (BCs): for the inflow and outflow conditions as well as for the lateral BCs to represent a fluid at rest. Special attention will be paid to the latter because the difficulties come from the non-zero circulation of the vortex system considered. The classic BCs of Poinsot and Lele (J. Comput. Phys. 1992; 101: 104–129) based on the characteristics wave approach have been modified to be more adapted to the physics considered here. This new BC is based on the assumption of an irrotational flow close to the borders (in order to determine the magnitude of the waves), as the vorticity field is concentrated on the computational domain centre where the vortex system is initially placed. After a validation of these improved BCs and of all numerical tools used such as selective artificial dissipation, two spatial simulations of the vortex breakdown phenomenon have allowed validating our solver for a three-dimensional case by comparison with the results of Ruith et al. (J. Fluid Mech. 2003; 486:331–378). Thus, the merging process of equal co-rotating vortices through the development of elliptic instability with axial velocity were simulated. Three vortex flow configurations were considered with different vortex systems and velocity peaks ratio (azimuthal and axial velocities). A numerical tool has been elaborated and validated for the simulation of spatial instability development in vortex flows. The first results show this ability, and the influence of the axial velocity on the dynamics of the instabilities. However, spatial simulations are limited by the computational resources (linked to the resolution and axial domain length to capture the merging process) and restricted to academic vortex flow configuration. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Thomas Leweke,et al.  Physics of vortex merging , 2005 .

[2]  K. Thompson Time-dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, II , 1990 .

[3]  S. L. Dizes,et al.  Elliptic instability in a strained Batchelor vortex , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  C. Bailly,et al.  Direct computation of the noise generated by a hot coaxial jet , 2007 .

[5]  A. Lyrintzis,et al.  3-D large eddy simulation for jet aeroacoustics , 2003 .

[6]  F. Laporte,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of the elliptic instability of a vortex pair , 2000 .

[7]  J. Chomaz,et al.  Experimental study of vortex breakdown in swirling jets , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  David H. Rudy,et al.  A nonreflecting outflow boundary condition for subsonic navier-stokes calculations , 1980 .

[9]  Florent Laporte,et al.  Theoretical predictions for the elliptical instability in a two-vortex flow , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  Nonreflecting boundary conditions for Euler equation calculations , 1990 .

[11]  C. Bogey Three-dimensional non-refrective boundary conditions for acoustic simulation : far field formulation and validation test cases , 2002 .

[12]  D. Saville Electrohydrodynamic oscillation and stability of a charged drop , 1974 .

[13]  Reynolds number dependence of two-dimensional laminar co-rotating vortex merging , 2005 .

[14]  C. Tam,et al.  Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics , 1993 .

[15]  E. Creusé,et al.  Towards a transparent boundary condition for compressible Navier–Stokes equations , 2001 .

[16]  Kenneth G. Powell,et al.  Viscous and inviscid instabilities of a trailing vortex , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Yi Wang,et al.  Characteristic boundary conditions for direct simulations of turbulent counterflow flames , 2005 .

[18]  C. Tam,et al.  RADIATION AND OUTFLOW BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR DIRECT COMPUTATION OF ACOUSTIC AND FLOW DISTURBANCES IN A NONUNIFORM MEAN FLOW , 1996 .

[19]  Charles H. K. Williamson,et al.  The physical mechanism for vortex merging , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  F. Nicoud,et al.  Compact finite difference schemes on non-uniform meshes. Application to direct numerical simulations of compressible flows , 1999 .

[21]  Tim Colonius,et al.  MODELING ARTIFICIAL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR COMPRESSIBLE FLOW , 2004 .

[22]  M. Giles,et al.  UNSFLO : a numerical method for unsteady inviscid flow in turbomachinery , 1988 .

[23]  P. Orlandi Two-dimensional and three-dimensional direct numerical simulation of co-rotating vortices , 2007 .

[24]  T. Maxworthy,et al.  Three-dimensional vortex breakdown in swirling jets and wakes: direct numerical simulation , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  Thierry Poinsot,et al.  Wave propagation in vortices and vortex bursting , 2005 .

[26]  T. Poinsot Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows , 1992 .

[27]  Eli Turkel,et al.  Far field boundary conditions for compressible flows , 1982 .

[28]  S. Leibovich THE STRUCTURE OF VORTEX BREAKDOWN , 1978 .

[29]  S. Lele Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution , 1992 .

[30]  Gregory A. Blaisdell,et al.  The effect of the formulation of nonlinear terms on aliasing errors in spectral methods , 1996 .