Online Discussion and Self-Regulated Learning: Effects of Instructional Methods on Mathematical Literacy

ABSTRACT The authors investigated the effects of online discussion embedded within metacognitive guidance on mathematical literacy and self-regulated learning (SRL). They compared 4 instructional methods: online discussion embedded within metacognitive guidance (Online+Meta), online discussion without metacognitive guidance (Online), face-to-face discussion with metacognitive guidance (Ftf+Meta), and face-to-face discussion without metacognitive guidance (Ftf). Participants were 86 seventh-grade Israeli boys and girls who practiced problem solving in 4 classes. Results showed that the Online+Meta students significantly outperformed the Ftf+Meta students, who, in turn, significantly outperformed the Online and Ftf students on mathematical literacy of standard tasks, real-life tasks, and various aspects of self-regulated learning. Regarding Online students, results were mixed; these students outperformed the Ftf students on part of the criteria for standard problem-solving standard tasks and real-life tasks. The authors found no significant differences between the Online and Ftf students on SRL. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

[1]  Brigid Barron,et al.  Problem Solving in Video-based Microworlds: Collaborative and Individual Outcomes of High-Achieving Sixth-Grade Students. , 2000 .

[2]  D. Forrest-Pressley,et al.  Metacognition, cognition, and human performance , 1985 .

[3]  Bracha Kramarski,et al.  Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in the Classroom: The Effects of Cooperative Learning and Metacognitive Training , 2003 .

[4]  E. Corte,et al.  Self-Regulation: A Characteristic and a Goal of Mathematics Education , 2000 .

[5]  Brigid Barron.  Achieving Coordination in Collaborative Problem-Solving Groups , 2000 .

[6]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[7]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  Perspective on M. Lampert’s “When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching” , 2004 .

[8]  T. Conlon.  The Internet Is Not a Panacea. , 1997 .

[9]  B. Zimmerman.  Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective , 1998 .

[10]  Bracha Kramarski,et al.  Effects of Multilevel Versus Unilevel Metacognitive Training on Mathematical Reasoning , 2001 .

[11]  Paul Cobb,et al.  An Analysis of Development of Sociomathematical Norms in One First-Grade Classroom , 2001 .

[12]  B. Kramarski,et al.  The effects of metacognition and email interactions on learning graphing , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  Marcel V. J. Veenman,et al.  The assessment of metacognitive skills: what can be learned from multi-method designs? , 2005 .

[14]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[15]  E. Corte,et al.  ENHANCING LEARNING AND PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS: ORIENTING AND SELF- JUDGING, TWO POWERFUL AND TRAINABLE LEARNING TOOLS , 1999 .

[16]  Fern Tavalin,et al.  Good online conversation: building on research to inform practice , 2000 .

[17]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[18]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[19]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[20]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[21]  Candace S. Bos,et al.  Cognitive and metacognitive characteristics of eighth grade students' mathematical problem solving , 1990 .

[22]  A. Schoenfeld.  Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint) , 2009 .

[23]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments , 2000 .

[24]  Z. Mevarech,et al.  Improve: A Multidimensional Method For Teaching Mathematics in Heterogeneous Classrooms , 1997 .

[25]  Bracha Kramarski,et al.  Making sense of graphs: does metacognitive instruction make a difference on students' mathematical conceptions and alternative conceptions? , 2004 .