Spatial and temporal response properties of lagged and nonlagged cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus.

1. It has recently been shown that the X- and Y-cell classes in the A-layers of the cat lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are divisible into lagged and nonlagged types. We have characterized the visual response properties of 153 cells in the A-layers to 1) reveal response features that are relevant to the X/Y and lagged/nonlagged classification schemes, and 2) provide a systematic description of the properties of lagged and nonlagged cells as a basis for understanding mechanisms that affect these two groups. Responses to flashing spots and drifting gratings were measured as the contrast and spatial and temporal modulation were varied. 2. X- and Y-cells were readily distinguished by their spatial tuning. Y-cells had much lower preferred spatial frequencies and spatial resolution than X-cells. Within each functional class (X or Y), however, lagged and nonlagged cells were similar in their spatial response properties. Thus the lagged/nonlagged distinction is not one related to the spatial domain. 3. In the temporal domain X- and Y-cells showed little difference in temporal tuning, whereas lagged and nonlagged cells showed distinctive response properties. The temporal tuning functions of lagged cells were slightly shifted toward lower frequencies with optimal temporal frequencies of lagged X-cells averaging an octave lower than those of nonlagged X-cells. Temporal resolution was much lower in lagged X- and Y-cells than in their nonlagged counterparts. 4. The most dramatic differences between lagged and nonlagged cells appeared in the timing of their responses, as measured by the phase of the response relative to the sinusoidal luminance modulation of a spot centered in the receptive field. Response phase varied approximately linearly with temporal frequency. The slope of the phase versus frequency line is a measure of total integration time, which we refer to as visual latency. Lagged cells has much longer latencies than nonlagged cells. 5. The intercept of the phase versus frequency line is a measure of when in the stimulus cycle the cell responds: we refer to this as the intrinsic or absolute phase of the cell. This measure of response timing not only distinguished lagged and nonlagged cells well but also covaried with the sustained or transient nature of cells' responses to flashed stimuli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co‐ordinates and optics , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[3]  R. W. Rodieck Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. , 1965, Vision research.

[4]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  K. Sanderson,et al.  The projection of the visual field to the lateral geniculate and medial interlaminar nuclei in the cat , 1971, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  W. Levick,et al.  Sustained and transient neurones in the cat's retina and lateral geniculate nucleus , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  H Ikeda,et al.  Receptive field organization of ‘sustained’ and ‘transient’ retinal ganglion cells which subserve different functional roles , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  J. Stone,et al.  Relay of receptive-field properties in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Stone,et al.  Projection of X- and Y-cells of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus to areas 17 and 18 of visual cortex. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  D. Tolhurst Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of a moving visual stimulus , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  R. Shapley,et al.  Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell classifications. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  J. Stone,et al.  Properties of relay cells in cat's lateral geniculate nucleus: a comparison of W-cells with X- and Y-cells. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  R. Shapley,et al.  The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  P. Hammond Inadequacy of nitrous oxide/oxygen mixtures for maintaining anaesthesia in cats: satisfactory alternatives , 1978, Pain.

[16]  Jonathan Stone,et al.  Hierarchical and parallel mechanisms in the organization of visual cortex , 1979, Brain Research Reviews.

[17]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Spatial and temporal properties of X and Y cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  S. Sherman,et al.  Spatial and temporal sensitivity of X- and Y-cells in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  D. Pollen,et al.  Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex. , 1981, Science.

[20]  V Virsu,et al.  Phase of responses to moving sinusoidal gratings in cells of cat retina and lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  J D Victor,et al.  How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  R. Shapley,et al.  Spatial tuning of cells in and around lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: X and Y relay cells and perigeniculate interneurons. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[24]  J. Malpeli Activity of cells in area 17 of the cat in absence of input from layer a of lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  R. Dykes,et al.  Functional role of GABA in cat primary somatosensory cortex: shaping receptive fields of cortical neurons. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  S. Sherman Functional organization of the W-, X-, and Y- cell pathways in the cat: A review and hypothesis , 1985 .

[28]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  A. L. Humphrey,et al.  Projection patterns of individual X‐ and Y‐cell axons from the lateral geniculate nucleus to cortical area 17 in the cat , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[32]  A. Sestokas,et al.  Visual response latency of X- and Y-cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat , 1986, Vision Research.

[33]  D N Mastronarde,et al.  Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. II. Retinal inputs and the generation of receptive-field properties. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  D N Mastronarde,et al.  Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Receptive-field properties and classification of cells. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  R. Shapley,et al.  Linear mechanisms of directional selectivity in simple cells of cat striate cortex. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1987 .

[37]  R E Weller,et al.  Structural correlates of functionally distinct X‐cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[38]  G. Westbrook,et al.  Slow excitatory postsynaptic currents mediated by N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptors on cultured mouse central neurones. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  A. L. Humphrey,et al.  Functionally distinct groups of X‐cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[40]  L. Palmer,et al.  Contribution of linear spatiotemporal receptive field structure to velocity selectivity of simple cells in area 17 of cat , 1989, Vision Research.