Is the iPad suitable for image display at American Board of Radiology examinations?

OBJECTIVE The study aimed to determine the acceptability of the iPad 3 as a display option for American Board of Radiology (ABR) examinations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS A set of 20 cases for each of nine specialties examined by the ABR was prepared. Each comprised between one and seven images and case information and had been used in previous ABR Initial Certification examinations. Examining radiologists (n = 119) at the ABR oral Initial Certification examinations reviewed sets from one or more specialties on both a 2 MP LED monitor and on the iPad 3 and rated the visibility of the salient image features for each case. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed to compare ratings. In addition, a thematic analysis of participants' opinions was undertaken. RESULTS When all specialties were pooled, the iPad 3 ratings were significantly higher than the monitor ratings (p = 0.0217). The breast, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and nuclear medicine specialties also returned significantly higher ratings for the visibility of relevant image features for the iPad 3. Monitor ratings were significantly higher for the vascular and interventional specialty, although no images were rated unacceptably poor on the iPad in this specialty. CONCLUSION The relevant image features were rated more visible on the iPad 3 than on the monitors overall. The iPad 3 was well accepted by a large majority of examiners and can be considered adequate for image display for examination in most or all specialties.

[1]  Seth J Berkowitz,et al.  Resident iPad use: has it really changed the game? , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[2]  Michael Kendrick,et al.  The Radiology Resident iPad Toolbox: an educational and clinical tool for radiology residents. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[3]  Matthias Hammon,et al.  Can the Documented Patient Briefing Be Carried Out with an iPad App? , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[4]  Mitsuru Ikeda,et al.  Comparison of liquid crystal display monitors calibrated with gray-scale standard display function and with γ 2.2 and iPad: observer performance in detection of cerebral infarction on brain CT. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  K. Horton,et al.  Informatics in radiology: CT contrast protocols application for the iPad: new resource for technologists, nurses, and radiologists. , 2013, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  Michael G Evanoff,et al.  Flexible image evaluation: iPad versus secondary-class monitors for review of MR spinal emergency cases, a comparative study. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[7]  Tchoyoson C. C. Lim,et al.  The iPad Tablet Computer for Mobile On-Call Radiology Diagnosis? Auditing Discrepancy in CT and MRI Reporting , 2012, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  Mark Scarbecz,et al.  Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor. , 2012, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[9]  Makoto Matsubara,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging navigation during a lung segmentectomy using an iPad. , 2012, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  Michael M. Maher,et al.  Emergency CT brain: preliminary interpretation with a tablet device: image quality and diagnostic performance of the Apple iPad , 2012, Emergency Radiology.

[11]  Elliot K. Fishman,et al.  The iPad as a mobile device for CT display and interpretation: diagnostic accuracy for identification of pulmonary embolism , 2012, Emergency Radiology.

[12]  H. Meinzer,et al.  iPad-assisted percutaneous access to the kidney using marker-based navigation: initial clinical experience. , 2012, European urology.

[13]  Kazuhiro Hongo,et al.  Operation-microscope-mounted touch display tablet computer for intraoperative imaging visualization. , 2012, World neurosurgery.

[14]  Osman Ratib,et al.  A lung segmentectomy performed with 3D reconstruction images available on the operating table with an iPad. , 2011, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[15]  Elizabeth Krupinski,et al.  Impact of Hindsight Bias on Interpretation of Nonenhanced Computed Tomographic Head Scans for Acute Stroke , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  Elizabeth A Krupinski,et al.  Evaluation of off-the-shelf displays for use in the American Board of Radiology maintenance of certification examination. , 2009, Radiology.

[17]  David Gur,et al.  The effect of image display size on observer performance an assessment of variance components. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[18]  P F Judy,et al.  Influence of CT image size and format on accuracy of lung nodule detection. , 1998, Radiology.

[19]  T D Cradduck,et al.  National electrical manufacturers association , 1983, Journal of the A.I.E.E..

[20]  Eliot Siegel,et al.  TB or Not TB: interreader and intrareader variability in screening diagnosis on an iPad versus a traditional display. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.