Communication channels used by academic staff in interacting with their students

The aim of this paper is to report the findings on the impact of communication technology as a channel for interaction between academic staff and their students, conducted at a Malaysian higher learning institution. The study focused on media choice and it attempted to determine the communication channels mostly used by academic staff in interacting with their students and the reasons for selecting these channels. It also intended to find out whether there was a significant relationship between communication channels mostly used by academic staff and their perception of media richness. The results revealed that although the existence of new communication technologies such as the internet offers faster and cheaper facilities, face-to-face communication is still the most used and preferred communication channel by academic staff in interacting with their students. In addition, there was a significant relationship between the communication channel mostly used by respondents and their perception of media richness and social presence. This explained why the higher level of social presence, the higher the level of experience with a channel would be. The findings of this study extended two of the most widely investigated media choice theories; Media Richness Theory (MRT) and Social Presence Theory (SPT).

[1]  Dag H. Olsen,et al.  A study of factors influencing media choice in Norwegian organizations , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[3]  K. Wright.  Computer-Mediated Social Support, Older Adults, and Coping. , 2000 .

[4]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction , 2002 .

[5]  Michael A. McCollough,et al.  Guaranteeing Student Satisfaction: An Exercise in Treating Students as Customers , 1999 .

[6]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Technology and Organizations , 1990 .

[7]  Catherine A. Doherty,et al.  E-mail as a "contact zone" for teacher-student relationships , 2003 .

[8]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[9]  Chih-Hsiung Tu,et al.  The Measurement of Social Presence in an Online Learning Environment , 2002 .

[10]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[11]  Ned Kock,et al.  The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[12]  R. Rice.  Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media , 1993 .

[13]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Group Support Systems (GSS) and Task Type on Group Interactions from an Influence Perspective , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[15]  E-MAIL: INSTRUCTIONAL POTENTIALS AND LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES , 2002 .

[16]  Mark Keil,et al.  Feedback Channels: Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Voice Mail to E-Mail , 2002, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[17]  Tony Bates.  Technology, open learning and distance education / Tony Bates , 1995 .