Optimality of Upper-Arm Reaching Trajectories Based on the Expected Value of the Metabolic Energy Cost

When we move our body to perform a movement task, our central nervous system selects a movement trajectory from an infinite number of possible trajectories under constraints that have been acquired through evolution and learning. Minimization of the energy cost has been suggested as a potential candidate for a constraint determining locomotor parameters, such as stride frequency and stride length; however, other constraints have been proposed for a human upper-arm reaching task. In this study, we examined whether the minimum metabolic energy cost model can also explain the characteristics of the upper-arm reaching trajectories. Our results show that the optimal trajectory that minimizes the expected value of energy cost under the effect of signal-dependent noise on motor commands expresses not only the characteristics of reaching movements of typical speed but also those of slower movements. These results suggest that minimization of the energy cost would be a basic constraint not only in locomotion but also in upper-arm reaching.

[1]  Jun Nishii,et al.  Legged insects select the optimal locomotor pattern based on the energetic cost , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Ning Qian,et al.  Different Predictions by the Minimum Variance and Minimum Torque-Change Models on the Skewness of Movement Velocity Profiles , 2004, Neural Computation.

[3]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[4]  Alexander Rm,et al.  A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories. , 1997 .

[5]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[6]  G. Zahalak,et al.  A distribution-moment model of energetics in skeletal muscle. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  A. Minetti,et al.  A theory of metabolic costs for bipedal gaits. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  N. Hogan.  An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  Y Uno,et al.  Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  N. A. Bernshteĭn.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[12]  P. Morasso.  Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Jun Nishii,et al.  Constraint and exploitation of redundant degrees of freedom during walking , 2012, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[14]  N. Curtin,et al.  Energetic aspects of muscle contraction. , 1985, Monographs of the Physiological Society.

[15]  Francesco Nori,et al.  Evidence for Composite Cost Functions in Arm Movement Planning: An Inverse Optimal Control Approach , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  J. Nishii.  An analytical estimation of the energy cost for legged locomotion. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  M. Kawato,et al.  Optimal impedance control for task achievement in the presence of signal-dependent noise. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Jeremy D Wong,et al.  The central nervous system does not minimize energy cost in arm movements. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Yasuharu Koike,et al.  Estimation of dynamic joint torques and trajectory formation from surface electromyography signals using a neural network model , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  Paul L Gribble,et al.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement? , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  J. L. Leeuwen.  Muscle Function in Locomotion , 1992 .

[26]  A. Hill.  The effect of load on the heat of shortening of muscle , 1964, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[27]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  TOPS (Task Optimization in the Presence of Signal-Dependent Noise) model , 2004, Systems and Computers in Japan.

[28]  Helen J. Huang,et al.  Reduction of Metabolic Cost during Motor Learning of Arm Reaching Dynamics , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[30]  R. Kram,et al.  Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Yoshiaki Taniai,et al.  Evaluation of Trajectory Planning Models for Arm-Reaching Movements Based on Energy Cost , 2009, Neural Computation.

[32]  C. W. Radcliffe,et al.  Predicting metabolic cost of level walking , 1978, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[33]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Musculoskeletal Systems with Intrinsic and Proprioceptive Feedback , 2000 .

[34]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Stochastic Optimal Control and Estimation Methods Adapted to the Noise Characteristics of the Sensorimotor System , 2005, Neural Computation.

[35]  Jean-Paul Gauthier,et al.  The Inactivation Principle: Mathematical Solutions Minimizing the Absolute Work and Biological Implications for the Planning of Arm Movements , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..