A Way Forward for Land-Use Planning to Achieve Policy Goals by Using Spatial Modelling Scenarios

This paper investigates how demographic (socioeconomic) and land-use (physical and environmental) data can be integrated within a decision support framework to formulate and evaluate land-use planning scenarios. A case-study approach is undertaken with land-use planning scenarios for a rapidly growing coastal area in Australia, the Shire of Hervey Bay. The town and surrounding area require careful planning of the future urban growth between competing land uses. Three potential urban growth scenarios are put forth to address this issue. Scenario A (‘continued growth’) is based on existing socioeconomic trends. Scenario B (‘maximising rates base’) is derived using optimisation modelling of land-valuation data. Scenario C (‘sustainable development’) is derived using a number of social, economic, and environmental factors and assigning weightings of importance to each factor using a multiple criteria analysis approach. The land-use planning scenarios are presented through the use of maps and tables within a geographical information system, which delineate future possible land-use allocations up until 2021. The planning scenarios are evaluated by using a goal-achievement matrix approach. The matrix is constructed with a number of criteria derived from key policy objectives outlined in the regional growth management framework and town planning schemes. The authors of this paper examine the final efficiency scores calculated for each of the three planning scenarios and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the three land-use modelling approaches used to formulate the final scenarios.

[1]  John Stillwell,et al.  Planning Support Systems in Practice , 2003 .

[2]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[3]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  A stochastically constrained cellular model of urban growth , 2000 .

[4]  B. Simpson Quantitative methods for planning and urban studies , 1985 .

[5]  Emilio Chuvieco,et al.  Integration of Linear Programming and GIS for Land-Use Modelling , 1993, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Eastman J. Ronald,et al.  RASTER PROCEDURES FOR MULTI-CRITERIA/MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISIONS , 1995 .

[7]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Developments in Geographical Information and Planning , 1999 .

[8]  Amitai Etzioni Mixed-Scanning: A 'Third' Approach to Decision-Making , 1967 .

[9]  Morris Hill A METHOD FOR EVALUATING ALTERNATIVE PLANS: THE GOALS-ACHIEVEMENT MATRIX APPLIED TO TRANSPORTATION PLANS. , 1966 .

[10]  S Westmacott,et al.  Developing decision support systems for integrated coastal management in the tropics: is the ICM decision-making environment too complex for the development of a useable and useful DSS? , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  John Asafu-Adjaye,et al.  Environmental economics for non-economists , 2000 .

[12]  Ag Wilson,et al.  Transport, location and spatial systems: planning with spatial interaction models and related approaches. , 1983 .

[13]  P. Allen Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems: Models of Complexity , 1997 .

[14]  Fulong Wu,et al.  SimLand: A Prototype to Simulate Land Conversion Through the Integrated GIS and CA with AHP-Derived Transition Rules , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Yehezkel Dror The Planning Process : a Facet Design , 1963 .

[16]  John W. Dickey,et al.  TOPAZ: General planning technique and its applications at the regional, urban, and facility planning levels , 1980 .

[17]  Jeffrey L. Arthur,et al.  Clarification on the Use of Linear Programming and GIS for Land-Use Modelling , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[18]  J. Landis IMAGINING LAND USE FUTURES: APPLYING THE CALIFORNIA URBAN FUTURES MODEL , 1995 .

[19]  Roger White,et al.  Integrating Constrained Cellular Automata Models, GIS and Decision Support Tools for Urban Planning , 2003 .

[20]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  On the Use of Weighted Linear Combination Method in GIS: Common and Best Practice Approaches , 2000, Trans. GIS.

[21]  Kingsley E. Haynes,et al.  Productivity Change in Manufacturing Regions: A Multifactor/Shift‐Share Approach , 1997 .

[22]  L. Sandercock,et al.  Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities , 1997 .

[23]  John Asafu Adjaye Environmental Economics for Non-Economists , 2000 .

[24]  Farhana Azim Design in Nature , 2014 .

[25]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Loose-Coupling a Cellular Automaton Model and GIS: Long-Term Urban Growth Prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[26]  M. Batty,et al.  Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata , 1999 .

[27]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  The What If? Collaborative Planning Support System , 1999 .