The need for cognition.

Four studies are reported in which a scale to assess the need for cognition (i.e., the tendency for an individual to engage in and enjoy thinking) was developed and validated. In Study 1 a pool of items was administered to groups known to differ in need for cognition. Members of a university faculty served as subjects in the high-need-for-cognition group, whereas assembly line workers served as subjects in the low-need-for-cognition group. The criteria of ambiguity, irrelevance, and internal consistency were used to select the items for subsequent studies. A factor analysis was performed on the selected items and yielded one major factor. In 'Study 2 the scale was administered to a more homogeneous population (400 undergraduates) to validate the factor structure obtained in Study 1 and to determine whether the scale tapped a construct distinct from test anxiety and cognitive style. The factor structure was replicated in Study 2, responses to the need for cognition scale were predictably and weakly related to cognitive style, and responses were unrelated,to test anxiety. In Study 3, 104 subjects completed need for cognition, social desirability, and dogmatism scales and indicated what their American College Test scores were. Results indicated that need for cognition was related weakly and negatively to being close minded, unrelated to social desirability, and positively correlated with general intelligence. Study 4 replicated the major findings of Study 3 and furnished evidence of thj predictive validity of the Need for Cognition Scale: Attitudes toward simple an complex versions of a cognitive task appeared indistinguishable until the subjects' need for cognition was considered. The theoretical utility of the construct and measure of need for cognition are discussed.

[1]  Dynamics of personality organization. II. , 1943 .

[2]  E. Frenkel-Brunswik Personality: A biosocial approach to origins and structure. , 1948 .

[3]  D. Mcclelland,et al.  The Achievement Motive , 1954 .

[4]  D. Katz,et al.  The motivational bases of attitude change. , 1954, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  C. Osgood,et al.  The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. , 1955, Psychological review.

[6]  E. Stotland,et al.  An experimental investigation of need for cognition. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[8]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[9]  D. Katz THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[10]  Milton Rokeach,et al.  The Open and Closed Mind , 1961 .

[11]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  MANUAL FOR KIT OF REFERENCE TESTS FOR COGNITIVE FACTORS (REVISED 1963) , 1963 .

[12]  J. Brehm,et al.  Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance , 1962 .

[13]  Verling C. Troldahl,et al.  A Short-Form Dogmatism Scale for Use in Field Studies , 1965 .

[14]  C. I. Hovland The Order Of Presentation In Persuasion , 1966 .

[15]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Foundations of Social Psychology , 1967 .

[16]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Effects of actual effort and anticipated effort on task enhancement , 1971 .

[17]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Chapter 11 – EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO TEST ANXIETY: ATTENTION AND THE USES OF INFORMATION , 1972 .

[18]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Dogmatism and tolerance for ambiguity as determinants of differential reactions to cognitive inconsistency. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[20]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[21]  Arthur L. Blumenthal,et al.  The process of cognition , 1977 .

[22]  Robert Hogan,et al.  A role theoretical interpretation of personality scale item responses , 1978 .

[23]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  A Questionnaire Measure of Individual Differences in Achieving Tendency , 1978 .

[24]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[25]  R. Wyer,et al.  Social Cognition, Inference, and Attribution , 1979 .

[26]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Sex Differences in Influenceability , 1980 .

[27]  水口 公信,et al.  疼痛とfield dependence(口腔外科・麻酔) , 1980 .

[28]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue Involvement As a Moderator of the Effects on Attitude of Advertising Content and Context , 1981 .

[29]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[30]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[31]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[32]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.