Fixed Price Approximability of the Optimal Gain from Trade

Bilateral trade is a fundamental economic scenario comprising a strategically acting buyer and seller (holding an item), each holding valuations for the item, drawn from publicly known distributions. It was recently shown that the only mechanisms that are simultaneously dominant strategy incentive compatible, strongly budget balanced, and ex-post individually rational, are fixed price mechanisms, i.e., mechanisms that are parametrised by a price p, and trade occurs if and only if the valuation of the buyer is at least p and the valuation of the seller is at most p. The gain from trade (GFT) is the increase in welfare that results from applying a mechanism. We study the GFT achievable by fixed price mechanisms. We explore this question for both the bilateral trade setting and a double auction setting where there are multiple i.i.d. unit demand buyers and sellers. We first identify a fixed price mechanism that achieves a GFT of at least 2 / r times the optimum, where r is the probability that the seller’s valuation does not exceed that of the buyer’s valuation. This extends a previous result by McAfee. Subsequently, we improve this approximation factor in an asymptotic sense, by showing that a more sophisticated rule for setting the fixed price results in a GFT within a factor \(O(\log (1/r))\) of the optimum. This is asymptotically the best approximation factor possible. For the double auction setting, we present a fixed price mechanism that achieves for all \(\epsilon > 0\) a gain from trade of at least \((1-\epsilon )\) times the optimum with probability \(1 - 2/e^{\#T \epsilon ^2 /2}\), where \(\#T\) is the expected number of trades of the mechanism. This can be interpreted as a “large market” result: Full efficiency is achieved in the limit, as the market gets thicker.

[1]  Moran Feldman,et al.  Online Truthful Mechanisms for Multi-sided Markets , 2016, ArXiv.

[2]  Steven R. Williams,et al.  The Optimality of a Simple Market Mechanism , 2002 .

[3]  Moran Feldman,et al.  Markets with Strategic Multi-minded Mediators , 2016, ArXiv.

[4]  Steven R. Williams,et al.  Convergence to Efficiency in a Simple Market with Incomplete Information , 1994 .

[5]  Elias Koutsoupias,et al.  Online Market Intermediation , 2017, ICALP.

[6]  R. Preston McAfee,et al.  The Gains from Trade Under Fixed Price Mechanisms , 2007 .

[7]  Thomas A. Gresik,et al.  The rate at which a simple market converges to efficiency as the number of traders increases: An asymptotic result for optimal trading mechanisms , 1989 .

[8]  R. McAfee,et al.  A dominant strategy double auction , 1992 .

[9]  Yang Cai,et al.  Approximating Gains from Trade in Two-sided Markets via Simple Mechanisms , 2017, EC.

[10]  Bart de Keijzer,et al.  Approximately Efficient Double Auctions with Strong Budget Balance , 2016, SODA.

[11]  Erel Segal-Halevi,et al.  SBBA: A Strongly-Budget-Balanced Double-Auction Mechanism , 2016, SAGT.

[12]  Shahar Dobzinski,et al.  (Almost) Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading , 2016, ArXiv.

[13]  Anna R. Karlin,et al.  Truthful and Competitive Double Auctions , 2002, ESA.

[14]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  Revenue Maximization for Market Intermediation with Correlated Priors , 2016, SAGT.

[15]  Liad Blumrosen,et al.  Approximating Gains-from-Trade in Bilateral Trading , 2016, WINE.

[16]  Shahar Dobzinski,et al.  Reallocation mechanisms , 2014, EC.

[17]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Approximately Efficient Two-Sided Combinatorial Auctions , 2016, EC.

[18]  Xiaotie Deng,et al.  Revenue maximization in a Bayesian double auction market , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[19]  M. Satterthwaite,et al.  Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading , 1983 .

[20]  Erel Segal-Halevi,et al.  A Random-Sampling Double-Auction Mechanism , 2016, ArXiv.