C. elegans locomotion : an integrated approach

he popular model organism Caenorhabditis elegans is a tiny nematode worm with a largely invariant nervous system, consisting of exactly 302 neurons with known connectivity. Moreover, the behavioural roles of many of these neurons have been uncovered using experimental techniques including targeted cell killing and genetic mutations. The result is an organism in which the locomotion subsystem is mapped at cellular resolution. Despite its small size and the apparent simplicity of the underlying nervous system, the worm is capable of a surprisingly rich repertoire of behaviours including navigation and foraging, mating, learning, and even rudimentary social behaviour. Indeed, this humble worm provides us with the first tangible possibility of understanding the complex behaviours of an organism from the genetic level, right up to the system level. The focus of this thesis on the locomotion system is motivated at least in part by the fact that most, if not all, of the worm’s behaviours are mediated by some form of locomotion. The main objective of this thesis is to help elucidate the mechanisms underlying C. elegans forward locomotion. In pursuit of this goal I apply an integrated methodology that emphasises collaboration between modellers like myself and experimentalists, ensuring that models are grounded in the biological reality and experiments are well designed and poignant. In contrast to previous models of C. elegans forward locomotion, the starting point of this investigation is the realization that the ability of the worm to locomote through a variety of different physical environments can shed light on the mechanism of neural and neuromuscular control of this behaviour. This work therefore begins with the presentation of several stand-alone studies, both theoretical and experimental, aimed at answering a number of preliminary questions. These include the development of a suitable model of the worm’s low Reynolds number physical environments; a preliminary study of the importance of body physics on the kinematics of locomotion; an electrophysiological modelling study of the worm’s body wall muscles; and an experimental investigation of the worm’s locomotion in different environments, ranging from liquid to dense gels. These results lead to a new perspective on the worm’s locomotion. Indeed, the conventional wisdom is that two kinematically distinct C. elegans locomotion behaviours – swimming in liquids and crawling on dense gel-like media – correspond to distinct locomotory gaits. By analysing the worm’s motion through these different media, we reveal a smooth modulation of the undulations from swimming to crawling, marked by a linear relationship between key locomotion metrics. These results point to a single locomotory gait, governed by the same underlying control mechanism. The core of this thesis is an integrated neuromechancial model of C. elegans forward locomotion. This model incorporates the results of the preliminary investigation of muscle, body and locomotion properties. The neural circuitry is grounded in the literature but simplified to a set of repeating units. Neuronal properties are modelled at different levels of abstraction, with a proof-of-concept continuous model that is used to ground assumptions in physiological data, and a simplified binary model that is then used to study the locomotion control in detail. A key property of the motor neurons in both these models is their bistable response, inspired by a recent publication demonstrating such properties in other motor neurons. Interestingly, the model is quite different to any that have come before, both in terms of its underlying neural dynamics and the behaviours that it addresses. The key achievement of this model is its ability to qualitatively and quantitatively account for locomotion across a range of media from water to agar, as well as in more complex (heterogeneous) environments. One particularly interesting result is the demonstration that a proprioceptive oscillatory mechanisms can account not only for the generation of the body undulation, but also the observed modulation in response to the changing physical environments. Indeed, this model lacks any form of centrally generated nervous system control. Finally, the model makes a number of important predictions about neuronal functions, synaptic functions and the proprioceptive response to different physical environments. A number of experiments and experimental designs are suggested to test these predictions. Preliminary experimental results are then presented to address each of these predictions. To date, these results all appear to validate the model and uncover new information about the locomotion system, hence demonstrating the power of the holistic, integrated methodology of this work. Specifically I address the role of the inhibitory D-class neurons and find evidence suggesting that they are part of the core circuit for forward locomotion, but that the phenotype associated with their removal only manifests strongly in less resistive (more fluid) media. Furthermore, I shed light on the relative roles of neural and muscle inhibition and suggest that it may be an absence of neural inhibition that underlies the forward locomotion defect of GABA defective worms.

[1]  Akshay Chandra Dey,et al.  Worms , 1919, The Indian medical gazette.

[2]  G. Taylor Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms , 1951, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  G. Taylor Analysis of the swimming of long and narrow animals , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  G. Hancock The self-propulsion of microscopic organisms through liquids , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  J. Gray,et al.  The Propulsion of Sea-Urchin Spermatozoa , 1955 .

[6]  H. R. Wallace MOVEMENT OF EELWORMS , 1960 .

[7]  L. Brain The Nervous System , 1963, Nature.

[8]  Piotr Mikolajczyk,et al.  A+A+C , 1964 .

[9]  J. Gray,et al.  THE LOCOMOTION OF NEMATODES. , 1964, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  R. G. Cox The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluid Part 1 . General theory , 1969 .

[11]  H. R. Wallace Wave Formation By Infective Larvae of the Plant Parasitic Nematode Meloidogyne Javanica , 1969 .

[12]  M. Lighthill Large-amplitude elongated-body theory of fish locomotion , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  J. Sulston,et al.  The DNA of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1974, Genetics.

[14]  R. L. Russell,et al.  Normal and mutant thermotaxis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  S. Brenner,et al.  The structure of the ventral nerve cord of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1976, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  E. Purcell Life at Low Reynolds Number , 2008 .

[17]  D. Albertson,et al.  Connectivity changes in a class of motoneurone during the development of a nematode , 1978, Nature.

[18]  E. Southgate,et al.  Structure and physiological activity of the motoneurons of the nematode Ascaris. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. E. Johnson,et al.  Flagellar hydrodynamics. A comparison between resistive-force theory and slender-body theory. , 1979, Biophysical Journal.

[20]  R. Edgar,et al.  Cuticle of Caenorhabditis elegans: its isolation and partial characterization , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  G. Ermentrout n:m Phase-locking of weakly coupled oscillators , 1981 .

[22]  P. Holmes,et al.  The nature of the coupling between segmental oscillators of the lamprey spinal generator for locomotion: A mathematical model , 1982, Journal of mathematical biology.

[23]  J. Hodgkin Male Phenotypes and Mating Efficiency in CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS. , 1983, Genetics.

[24]  George M. Maxwell,et al.  The Alimentary System , 1984 .

[25]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Frequency Plateaus in a Chain of Weakly Coupled Oscillators, I. , 1984 .

[26]  A. Stretton,et al.  Localization of choline acetyltransferase within identified motoneurons of the nematode Ascaris , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Brenner,et al.  The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  Ralph E. Davis,et al.  Neural control of behaviour in Ascaris , 1985, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  S. Brenner,et al.  The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1986, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[30]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Symmetry and phaselocking in chains of weakly coupled oscillators , 1986 .

[31]  E. Niebur,et al.  Computer simulation in brain science: Computer simulation of networks of electrotonic neurons , 1988 .

[32]  F. Wilczek,et al.  Geometry of self-propulsion at low Reynolds number , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  Re Davis,et al.  Signaling properties of Ascaris motorneurons: graded active responses, graded synaptic transmission, and tonic transmitter release , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[34]  N. Munakata [Genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans]. , 1989, Tanpakushitsu kakusan koso. Protein, nucleic acid, enzyme.

[35]  The neural basis of the locomotion of nematodes , 1990 .

[36]  DH Hall,et al.  The posterior nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: serial reconstruction of identified neurons and complete pattern of synaptic interactions , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  P. Erdös,et al.  Theory of the locomotion of nematodes: Dynamics of undulatory progression on a surface. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[38]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Rhythmogenic effects of weak electrotonic coupling in neuronal models. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Akira Azuma,et al.  The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming , 1992 .

[40]  H. Horvitz,et al.  The GABAergic nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans , 1993, Nature.

[41]  H. Horvitz,et al.  Genes required for GABA function in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1993, Nature.

[42]  Peter Wall,et al.  Introduction to C++ , 1993, TOOLS.

[43]  Ronald M. Harris-Warrick Pattern generation , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[44]  W. Walthall,et al.  Changing synaptic specificities in the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans: differentiation of the DD motoneurons. , 1993, Journal of neurobiology.

[45]  Y. Kuramoto,et al.  Dephasing and bursting in coupled neural oscillators. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[46]  E. Marder,et al.  Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation. , 1996, Physiological reviews.

[47]  R. Waterston,et al.  Interaction Between a Putative Mechanosensory Membrane Channel and a Collagen , 1996, Science.

[48]  M. Nonet,et al.  Appendix 2 Neurotransmitter Assignments for Specific Neurons , 1997 .

[49]  T. Barnes,et al.  The Caenorhabditis elegans Avermectin Resistance and Anesthetic Response Gene unc‐9 Encodes a Member of a Protein Family Implicated in Electrical Coupling of Excitable Cells , 1997, Journal of neurochemistry.

[50]  Curtin,et al.  Contractile properties of obliquely striated muscle from the mantle of squid (Alloteuthis subulata) and cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[51]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution-A simple evolution strategy for fast optimization , 1997 .

[52]  J. Berg Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. , 1998, Science.

[53]  Cori Bargmann Neurobiology of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. , 1998, Science.

[54]  E. Jorgensen,et al.  One GABA and two acetylcholine receptors function at the C. elegans neuromuscular junction , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Thomas M. Morse,et al.  The Fundamental Role of Pirouettes in Caenorhabditis elegans Chemotaxis , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  E. Marder Motor pattern generation , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  Sadri Hassani,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2000 .

[58]  S. Grillner,et al.  The intrinsic function of a motor system — from ion channels to networks and behavior 1 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 22 November 2000. , 2000, Brain Research.

[59]  D. V. Reddy,et al.  Experimental Evidence of Time Delay Induced Death in Coupled Limit Cycle Oscillators , 2000 .

[60]  P. Phelan,et al.  Innexins get into the gap , 2001, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[61]  J. Jadrich,et al.  Innexins in C. elegans , 2001, Cell communication & adhesion.

[62]  Scott L. Hooper Central Pattern Generators , 2001 .

[63]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  A connectionist central pattern generator for the aquatic and terrestrial gaits of a simulated salamander , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[64]  L. Ségalat,et al.  Characterization of K+ currents using an in situ patch clamp technique in body wall muscle cells from Caenorhabditis elegans , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[65]  Frederick C. Corey,et al.  Alexander , 1997, The Reign of Leo VI (886-912).

[66]  S. Brenner NATURE’S GIFT TO SCIENCE , 2002 .

[67]  L. Ségalat,et al.  The L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel EGL-19 controls body wall muscle function in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[68]  Sandhya P Koushika,et al.  Loss of the Putative RNA-Directed RNA Polymerase RRF-3 Makes C. elegans Hypersensitive to RNAi , 2002, Current Biology.

[69]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  The relative roles of feedforward and feedback in the control of rhythmic movements. , 2002, Motor control.

[70]  D. Hall,et al.  The Caenorhabditis elegans innexin INX-3 is localized to gap junctions and is essential for embryonic development. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[71]  S. Grillner The motor infrastructure: from ion channels to neuronal networks , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[72]  John Bryden A simulation model of the locomotion controllers for the , 2003 .

[73]  D. Weisblat,et al.  Ionic mechanisms of electrical activity in somatic muscle of the nematodeAscaris lumbricoides , 1976, Journal of comparative physiology.

[74]  David A. Weisblat,et al.  Propagation of electrical activity in the nerve cord and muscle syncytium of the nematodeAscaris lumbricoides , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[75]  R. Shingai,et al.  Neural network model to generate head swing in locomotion of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2004, Network.

[76]  A. Selverston Modulation of circuits underlying rhythmic behaviors , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[77]  P. Roy,et al.  Muscle arm development in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2005, Development.

[78]  L. W. Liu,et al.  Intercellular communication in smooth muscle , 1992, Experientia.

[79]  M. de Bono,et al.  Neuronal substrates of complex behaviors in C. elegans. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[80]  Cori Bargmann,et al.  A circuit for navigation in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2005 .

[81]  S. Lockery,et al.  Analysis of the effects of turning bias on chemotaxis in C. elegans , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[82]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Low Conductance Gap Junctions Mediate Specific Electrical Coupling in Body-wall Muscle Cells of Caenorhabditis elegans* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[83]  Osamu Shimomura,et al.  Discovery of green fluorescent protein. , 2005, Methods of biochemical analysis.

[84]  Theresa Stiernagle Maintenance of C. elegans. , 2006, WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology.

[85]  A. Ben-Yakar,et al.  Nerve Regeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans After Femtosecond Laser Axotomy , 2006, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[86]  Stephen E Von Stetina,et al.  The motor circuit. , 2006, International review of neurobiology.

[87]  D. Chklovskii,et al.  Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  Cori Bargmann Chemosensation in C. elegans. , 2006, WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology.

[89]  Dimitris P. Tsakiris,et al.  Polychaete-Like Undulatory Robotic Locomotion in Unstructured Substrates , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[90]  Paul W. Sternberg,et al.  Systems level circuit model of C. elegans undulatory locomotion: mathematical modeling and molecular genetics , 2007, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[91]  Qiang Liu,et al.  UNC-1 Regulates Gap Junctions Important to Locomotion in C. elegans , 2007, Current Biology.

[92]  J. H. Boyle,et al.  The role of body wall muscles in C. elegans locomotion , 2007 .

[93]  P. Sauvage Étude de la locomotion de C. elegans et perturbations mécaniques du mouvement , 2007 .

[94]  A. Fire,et al.  Gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. , 2007, Cell death and differentiation.

[95]  Beth L Pruitt,et al.  Analysis of nematode mechanics by piezoresistive displacement clamp , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[96]  Damon A. Clark,et al.  Mechanosensation and mechanical load modulate the locomotory gait of swimming C. elegans , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[97]  C. Mello Return to the RNAi world: rethinking gene expression and evolution. , 2007, Cell death and differentiation.

[98]  John Bryden,et al.  An Integrated Neuro-mechanical Model of C. elegansForward Locomotion , 2007, ICONIP.

[99]  S. Grillner,et al.  Neural bases of goal-directed locomotion in vertebrates—An overview , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[100]  Jonathan T. Pierce-Shimomura,et al.  Genetic analysis of crawling and swimming locomotory patterns in C. elegans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[101]  W. Ryu,et al.  Enhanced Caenorhabditis elegans Locomotion in a Structured Microfluidic Environment , 2008, PloS one.

[102]  A. V. Maricq,et al.  Action potentials contribute to neuronal signaling in C. elegans , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[103]  S. M. Coulthard,et al.  Artificial dirt: microfluidic substrates for nematode neurobiology and behavior. , 2008, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[104]  R. Tsien CONSTRUCTING AND EXPLOITING THE FLUORESCENT PROTEIN PAINTBOX , 2008 .

[105]  John Bryden,et al.  Neural control of Caenorhabditis elegans forward locomotion: the role of sensory feedback , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[106]  Bryan Petzold,et al.  SU-8 force sensing pillar arrays for biological measurements. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[107]  E. Jorgensen,et al.  Graded synaptic transmission at the Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junction , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[108]  N. Cohen,et al.  Forward locomotion of the nematode C. elegans is achieved through modulation of a single gait , 2009, HFSP journal.

[109]  Sarah Chaney,et al.  Behaviour , 2010, The Lancet.

[110]  Lav R. Varshney,et al.  Structural Properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans Neuronal Network , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..