Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model

Distributions of current produced by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans were predicted by a finite-element model representing several individual and collective refinements over prior efforts. A model of the entire human head and brain was made using a finely meshed (1.1x1.1x1.4mm(3) voxel) tissue dataset derived from the MRI data set of a normal human brain. The conductivities of ten tissues were simulated (bone, scalp, blood, CSF, muscle, white matter, gray matter, sclera, fat, and cartilage). We then modeled the effect of placing a "stimulating" electrode with a saline-like conductivity over F3, and a similar "reference" electrode over a right supraorbital (RS) location, as well as the complements of these locations, to compare expectations derived from the simulation with experimental data also using these locations in terms of the presence or absence of subjective and objective effects. The sensitivity of the results to changes in conductivity values were examined by varying white matter conductivity over a factor of ten. Our simulations established that high current densities were found directly under the stimulating and reference electrodes, but values of the same order of magnitude occurred in other structures, and many areas of the brain that might be behaviorally active were also subjected to what may be substantial amounts of current. The modeling also suggests that more targeted stimulations might be achieved by different electrode topologies.

[1]  M. Bikson,et al.  Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  S. Sato,et al.  Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals , 2005, Neurology.

[4]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  Determination of optimal electrode positions for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Felix M Mottaghy,et al.  Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic or direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS)-From insights into human memory to therapy of its dysfunction. , 2008, Methods.

[7]  J. Haueisen,et al.  The Influence of Brain Tissue Anisotropy on Human EEG and MEG , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  P. Å. Öberg,et al.  Magneto- and electrophosphenes: A comparative study , 1980, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[9]  P B Hoffer,et al.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. , 1994, Medical physics.

[10]  T. Woolsey,et al.  A Review for Medical Students The Brain Atlas: A Visual Guide to the Human Central Nervous System, 3rd ed. , 2009, McGill journal of medicine : MJM : an international forum for the advancement of medical sciences by students.

[11]  C A Terzuolo,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF IMPOSED VOLTAGE GRADIENT ADEQUATE TO MODULATE NEURONAL FIRING. , 1956, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  R. Sadleir,et al.  Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Patrick Reilly,et al.  Applied Bioelectricity: From Electrical Stimulation to Electropathology , 1998 .

[16]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  Carlos H. Muravchik,et al.  Effects of geometric head model perturbations on the EEG forward and inverse problems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  R. Schwarzenberger,et al.  The finite element method : a first approach , 1981 .

[19]  L. Lemieux,et al.  Statistical neuroanatomy of the human inferior frontal gyrus and probabilistic atlas in a standard stereotaxic space , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Pascal , 2007 .

[22]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Recharging cognition with DC brain polarization , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Thom F. Oostendorp,et al.  The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  J. Fermaglich Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[25]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[26]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Noninvasive human brain stimulation. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[28]  C Gabriel,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.