Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field

We measured discrimination threshold for time to contact with a simulated approaching object at 20 locations between 0 and 32 deg eccentricity in the left, right, upper, and lower visual fields. We also measured discrimination threshold for rate of expansion at the same 20 locations. At 0 deg eccentricity, discrimination of trial-to-trial variations in time to contact was virtually unaffected by simultaneous trial-to-trial variations of both rate of expansion and starting size, discrimination of trial-to-trial variations in rate of expansion was virtually unaffected by simultaneous trial-to-trial variations of both time to contact and starting size, and discrimination of trial-to-trial variations in starting size was virtually unaffected by simultaneous trial-to-trial variations of both time to contact and rate of expansion. We conclude that, in foveal vision, time to contact, rate of expansion and size can be processed simultaneously, independently and in parallel. Our main finding was that this independence progressively decreased as eccentricity increased. For example, in peripheral, but not in foveal vision, variations in rate of expansion produced illusory variations in time to contact. A secondary finding was that the effect of eccentricity on discrimination threshold for the task-relevant variable (whether time to contact or rate of expansion) was considerably less than the effect of eccentricity on visual acuity and on several other aspects of visual performance. We suggest that visual processing of time to contact is developed by exposure to optic flow patterns created by self-locomotion.

[1]  D Regan,et al.  Visual test results compared with flying performance in telemetry-tracked aircraft. , 1983, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  D. Regan.  Visual information channeling in normal and disordered vision. , 1982, Psychological review.

[3]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  V Cavallo,et al.  Visual Information and Skill Level in Time-To-Collision Estimation , 1988, Perception.

[5]  D. Regan,et al.  Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth , 1994, Vision Research.

[6]  R. Haber,et al.  Visual Perception , 2018, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[7]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[8]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  D. Regan,et al.  Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms? , 1979, Vision Research.

[10]  D Regan,et al.  Visual fields described by contrast sensitivity, by acuity, and by relative sensitivity to different orientations. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[12]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion , 1986, Vision Research.

[13]  J. Náñez.  Perception of impending collision in 3-to 6-week-old human infants , 1988 .

[14]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[15]  N. Drasdo.  The neural representation of visual space , 1977, Nature.

[16]  T. Bower,et al.  Infant responses to approaching objects: An indicator of response to distal variables , 1971 .

[17]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Model of peripheral and amblyopic hyperacuity , 1991, Vision Research.

[18]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.

[19]  D Regan,et al.  Visual responses to changing size and to sideways motion for different directions of motion in depth: linearization of visual responses. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[20]  H Collewijn,et al.  Binocular eye movements and the perception of depth. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[21]  S. McKee,et al.  The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field , 1984, Vision Research.

[22]  Fred Sir Hoyle,et al.  The Black Cloud , 1957 .

[23]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  D. Regan,et al.  Figure-ground segregation by motion contrast and by luminance contrast. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  G. Westheimer.  Scaling of visual acuity measurements. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  S. Klein,et al.  Position sense of the peripheral retina. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  D Regan,et al.  Visual Judgements and Misjudgements in Cricket, and the Art of Flight , 1992, Perception.

[28]  F. W. Weymouth.  Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. , 1958, American journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[30]  D Regan,et al.  Visually guided locomotion: psychophysical evidence for a neural mechanism sensitive to flow patterns. , 1979, Science.

[31]  Henri Poincaré,et al.  The Value of Science , 1905 .

[32]  J. Lewis,et al.  Probit Analysis (3rd ed). , 1972 .

[33]  Eileen Kowler.  Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[34]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[35]  R Näsänen,et al.  Cortical magnification and peripheral vision. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[36]  W. Ball,et al.  Infant Responses to Impending Collision: Optical and Real , 1971, Science.

[37]  G A Orban,et al.  Velocity discrimination in central and peripheral visual field. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[38]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Visual control of step length during running over irregular terrain. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  D M Levi,et al.  Peripheral hyperacuity: three-dot bisection scales to a single factor from 0 to 10 degrees. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[40]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[41]  T. Bower,et al.  Infant Response to Impending Optical Collision , 1980, Perception.

[42]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual fields for frontal plane motion and for changing size , 1983, Vision Research.

[43]  D Regan,et al.  How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking and the direction we are moving? , 1982, Science.

[44]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual control of locomotion. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[45]  G. J. Savelsbergh,et al.  Grasping tau. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  M. Cynader,et al.  The visual perception of motion in depth. , 1979, Scientific American.

[47]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.

[48]  A. Sekuler.  Simple-pooling of unidirectional motion predicts speed discrimination for looming stimuli , 1992, Vision Research.

[49]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. , 1990 .

[50]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual Timing in Hitting An Accelerating Ball , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[51]  R. Kruk,et al.  Flying Performance on the Advanced Simulator for Pilot Training and Laboratory Tests of Vision , 1983, Human factors.

[52]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Local structure of movement parallax of the plane , 1976 .

[53]  M. Banks,et al.  Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.