Trends in Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization in the United States, 2003-2016.

Importance Data on the contemporary changes in risk profile and outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary bypass grafting (CABG) are limited. Objective To assess the contemporary trends in the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing PCI or CABG in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used a national inpatient claims-based database to identify patients undergoing PCI or CABG from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2016. Data analysis was performed from July 15 to October 4, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Demographic characteristics, prevalence of risk factors, and clinical presentation divided into 3 eras (2003-2007, 2008-2012, and 2013-2016) and in-hospital mortality of PCI and CABG stratified by clinical indication. Results A total of 12 062 081 revascularization hospitalizations were identified: 8 687 338 PCIs (72.0%; mean [SD] patient age, 66.0 [10.8] years; 66.2% male) and 3 374 743 CABGs (28.0%; mean [SD] patient age, 64.5 [12.4] years; 72.1% male). The annual PCI volume decreased from 366 to 180 per 100 000 US adults and the annual CABG volume from 159 to 82 per 100 000 US adults. A temporal increase in the proportions of older, male, nonwhite, and lower-income patients and in the prevalence of atherosclerotic and nonatherosclerotic risk factors was found in both groups. The percentage of revascularization for myocardial infarction (MI) increased in the PCI group (22.8% to 53.1%) and in the CABG group (19.5% to 28.2%). Risk-adjusted mortality increased slightly after PCI for ST-segment elevation MI (4.9% to 5.3%; P < .001 for trend) and unstable angina or stable ischemic heart disease (0.8% to 1.0%; P < .001 for trend) but remained stable after PCI for non-ST-segment elevation MI (1.6% to 1.6%; P = .18 for trend). Risk-adjusted CABG morality markedly decreased in patients with MI (5.6% to 3.4% for all CABG and 4.8% to 3.0% for isolated CABG) and in those without MI (2.8% to 1.7% for all CABG and 2.1% to 1.2% for isolated CABG) (P < .001 for all). Conclusions and Relevance Significant changes were found in the characteristics of patients undergoing PCI and CABG in the United States between 2003 and 2016. Risk-adjusted mortality decreased significantly after CABG but not after PCI across all clinical indications.

[1]  M. Alkhouli,et al.  Temporal trends in the utilization and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with liver cirrhosis , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Stability After Initial Decline in Coronary Revascularization Rates in the United States. , 2019, Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

[3]  C. Rihal,et al.  Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  C. Rihal,et al.  Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of In-Hospital Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report From the NCDR CathPCI Registry , 2019, Circulation.

[6]  P. Arora,et al.  Incidence and in-hospital outcomes of single-vessel coronary chronic total occlusion treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[7]  D. Adams,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes After Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting by Experienced Surgeons. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  M. Mack,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting-fifty years of quality initiatives since Favaloro. , 2018, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[9]  R. Sachdeva,et al.  Sex and racial disparities in fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention utilization: a 5-year national experience. , 2018, Annals of translational medicine.

[10]  G. Torregrossa,et al.  Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[11]  P. Jüni,et al.  Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation). , 2017, Circulation.

[12]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Nonagenarians: A National Perspective. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  Joseph P Desimone,et al.  National Trends and Geographic Variation in Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Use in the United States. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  Harlan M. Krumholz,et al.  Adherence to Methodological Standards in Research Using the National Inpatient Sample , 2017, JAMA.

[15]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Outcomes of PCI in Relation to Procedural Characteristics and Operator Volumes in the United States. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Tao Yang,et al.  Increasing trend of diabetes combined with hypertension or hypercholesterolemia: NHANES data analysis 1999–2012 , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[17]  I. Durand-zaleski,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention , 2016, Open Heart.

[18]  S. Markwell,et al.  Trends in Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the 2000 to 2012 Medicare Population. , 2016, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  J. Messenger,et al.  Temporal Trends in the Risk Profile of Patients Undergoing Outpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry’s CathPCI Registry , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[20]  J. Messenger,et al.  Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI Registry. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2015, JAMA.

[22]  D. Glineur,et al.  Operative mortality with coronary artery bypass graft: where do we stand in 2015? , 2015, Current opinion in cardiology.

[23]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Relation between door-to-balloon times and mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention over time: a retrospective study , 2015, The Lancet.

[24]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Impact of Annual Operator and Institutional Volume on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: A 5-Year United States Experience (2005–2009) , 2014, Circulation.

[25]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Trends in use of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  Revascularisation versus medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  P. Jüni,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Abnormal Fractional Flow Reserve Interventional Cardiology , 2022 .

[28]  C. Dubois,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention, a historical perspective looking to the future. , 2013, Journal of thoracic disease.

[29]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  David M. Rocke,et al.  Impact of Public Reporting of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Performance Data on Market Share, Mortality, and Patient Selection , 2011, Medical care.

[31]  G. Lamas,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of the Totally Occluded Infarct-Related Artery in the Subacute Phase After Myocardial Infarction , 2011, Circulation.

[32]  Daniel Polsky,et al.  Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008. , 2011, JAMA.

[33]  Charles Maynard,et al.  Trends in Coronary Revascularization in the United States From 2001 to 2009: Recent Declines in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volumes , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[34]  J. Marcin,et al.  Impact of public reporting on access to coronary artery bypass surgery: the California Outcomes Reporting Program. , 2010, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[35]  Maria Mori Brooks,et al.  A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  S. Pocock,et al.  Guideline The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology ( STROBE ) Statement : Guidelines for reporting observational studies * , 2014 .

[37]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[38]  Matthias Egger,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[39]  Terry M Therneau,et al.  Coronary revascularization in the community. A population-based study, 1990 to 2004. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[40]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  Changes in patterns of coronary revascularization strategies for patients with acute coronary syndromes (from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative). , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[41]  D. Berman,et al.  Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  F. L. Lucas,et al.  Temporal Trends in the Utilization of Diagnostic Testing and Treatments for Cardiovascular Disease in the United States, 1993–2001 , 2006, Circulation.

[43]  G. Zou,et al.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[44]  M. Mack,et al.  Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[45]  M. Rohman,et al.  Internal mammary-coronary artery anastomosis. A nonsuture method employing tantalum rings. , 1961, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.