Spreading information and developing trust in social networks to accelerate diffusion of innovations

Abstract Background New food technologies developed by producers who want to spread their innovation require potential new adopters to receive information about the innovation as well as to develop trust about the appropriateness and quality of the new technology. Social networks are key for spreading information and for developing trust. In this essay, I will summarize sociological knowledge about how the structure of social networks can accelerate or inhibit innovation diffusion among consumers. Scope and approach Innovation adoption is mostly a multistage process in which potential adopters/consumers need to obtain information first. A second step towards adoption is developing appreciation for the advantages of the innovation. A third step is the development of trust that the new product or technology indeed brings the advantages that it promises. I will explain based on existing literature why and in what manner, different structural properties of social networks are crucial for the consumer side of the adoption process. Key findings and conclusions While for information diffusion predominantly the number of channels through which information can flow is important, and prevention of redundant information transfers helps to speed up information, the appreciation for the advantages of the innovation will require some redundancy and recurrent confirmation of the success of the innovation. To develop trust, even more confirmation is likely to be important and close social circles in which people repeatedly meet and know each other's acquaintances are known to be especially beneficial to create trust.

[1]  Per Bak,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness, by Duncan J. Watts , 2000 .

[2]  V. Buskens,et al.  Third-Party Effects , 2008 .

[3]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  Social networks and trust , 1999 .

[4]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  Trust in triads: An experimental study , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[5]  Arun G. Chandrasekhar,et al.  The Diffusion of Microfinance , 2012, Science.

[6]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[7]  Kazuo Yamaguchi,et al.  The flow of information through social networks: diagonal-free measures of inefficiency and the structural determinants of inefficiency , 1994 .

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[11]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[12]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social influence and opinions , 1990 .

[14]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[15]  Douglas Guilbeault,et al.  Complex Contagions: A Decade in Review , 2017, ArXiv.

[16]  Masahiro Kimura,et al.  Tractable Models for Information Diffusion in Social Networks , 2006, PKDD.

[17]  M Kretzschmar,et al.  Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease. , 1996, Mathematical biosciences.

[18]  Damon Centola How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions , 2018, Science.

[19]  Martina Morris,et al.  Epidemiology and Social Networks: , 1993 .

[20]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[21]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem , 1969 .

[22]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  9. A New Model for Information Diffusion in Heterogeneous Social Networks , 1999 .

[24]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2002 .

[25]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .