Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance

This commentary discusses why most IS acade- mic research today lacks relevance to practice and suggests tactics, procedures, and guidelines that the IS academic community might follow in their research efforts and articles to introduce rel- evance to practitioners. The commentary begins by defining what is meant by relevancy in the context of academic research. It then explains why there is a lack of attention to relevance with- in the IS scholarly literature. Next, actions that can be taken to make relevance a more central aspect of IS research and to communicate impli- cations of IS research more effectively to IS pro- fessionals are suggested.

[1]  Murray S. Davis,et al.  That's Interesting! , 1971 .

[2]  J. Dearden MIS Is a Mirage. , 1972 .

[3]  Richard L. Nolan,et al.  Managing the computer resource , 1973, Commun. ACM.

[4]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[5]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Mis Research: Reference disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition , 1980, ICIS.

[6]  J. M. Beyer,et al.  The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings. , 1982 .

[7]  Joseph L. C. Cheng,et al.  Toward an Integration of Organization Research and Practice: A Contingency Study of Bureaucratic Control and Performance in Scientific Settings. , 1983 .

[8]  R. Daft,et al.  Can Organization Studies Begin to Break Out of the Normal Science Straitjacket? An Editorial Essay , 1990 .

[9]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[10]  Raymond F. Zammuto,et al.  Organization Science, Managers, and Language Games , 1992 .

[11]  A. Farhoomand Review of "Corporate Information Systems Management: Text and Cases, Third Edition, by James I. Cash, Jr., F. W. McFarlan, James L. McKenney, and Lynda M. Applegate." Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1992 , 1993, DATB.

[12]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Relevance and rigour in Information Systems Research: some personal reflections on issues facing the Information Systems research community , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[13]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  R. L. Price A Customer's View of Organizational Literature , 1995 .

[15]  F. McFarlan,et al.  Corporate Information Systems Management: Issues Facing Senior Executives , 1995 .

[16]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi Results , 1996, MIS Q..

[19]  J. King,et al.  Crisis in the case study crisis: marginal diminishing returns to scale in the quantitative-qualitative research debate , 1997 .

[20]  Carol Saunders,et al.  The role of business in IT research , 1998 .