SOUTHERN COSMOLOGY SURVEY. III. QSOs FROM COMBINED GALEX AND OPTICAL PHOTOMETRY

We present catalogs of QSO candidates selected using photometry from Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) combined with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) in the Stripe 82 region and Blanco Cosmology Survey (BCS) near declination ?55?. The SDSS region contains 700 objects with magnitude i < 20 and 3600 objects with i < 21.5 in a 60 deg2 sky region, while the BCS region contains 280 objects with magnitude i < 20 and ~2000 objects with i < 21.5 for a 11 deg2 sky region that is being observed by three current microwave Sunyaev-Zeldovich surveys. Our QSO catalog is the first one in the BCS region. Deep GALEX exposures (2000 s in F UV and N UV, except in three fields) provide high signal-to-noise photometry in the GALEX bands (F UV, N UV < 24.5 mag). From this data, we select QSO candidates using only GALEX and optical r-band photometry, using the method given by Atlee & Gould. In the Stripe 82 field, 60% (30%) of the GALEX-selected QSOs with optical magnitude i < 20 (i < 21.5) also appear in the Richards et?al. QSO catalog constructed using five-band optical SDSS photometry. Comparison with the same catalog by Richards et?al. shows that the completeness of the sample is approximately 40% (25%). However, for regions of the sky with very low dust extinction, like the BCS 23-hr field and the Stripe 82 between 0? and 10? in R.A., our completeness is close to 95%, demonstrating that deep GALEX observations are almost as efficient as multiwavelength observations at finding QSOs. GALEX observations thus provide a viable alternate route to QSO catalogs in sky regions where u-band optical photometry is not available. The full catalog is available at http://www.ice.csic.es/personal/jimenez/PHOTOZ.

[1]  Bhasker K. Moorthy,et al.  The First Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0305492.

[2]  Andrew A. West,et al.  The Ultraviolet, Optical, and Infrared Properties of Sloan Digital Sky Survey Sources Detected by GALEX , 2005 .

[3]  A. Szalay,et al.  The On-Orbit Performance of the Galaxy Evolution Explorer , 2004, astro-ph/0411310.

[4]  A. Gould,et al.  Photometric Selection of QSO Candidates from GALEX Sources , 2006, astro-ph/0611820.

[5]  Alexander G. Gray,et al.  EFFICIENT PHOTOMETRIC SELECTION OF QUASARS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. II. ∼1, 000, 000 QUASARS FROM DATA RELEASE 6 , 2004, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[6]  N. Roche,et al.  SOUTHERN COSMOLOGY SURVEY. I. OPTICAL CLUSTER DETECTIONS AND PREDICTIONS FOR THE SOUTHERN COMMON-AREA MILLIMETER-WAVE EXPERIMENTS , 2008, 0808.0214.

[7]  R. Thacker,et al.  Measuring AGN Feedback with the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect , 2007, 0709.0952.

[8]  P. A. R. Ade,et al.  GALAXY CLUSTERS DISCOVERED WITH A SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT SURVEY , 2008, 0810.1578.

[9]  A. Szalay,et al.  Classification and Characterization of Objects from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer Survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2005 .

[10]  David Schiminovich,et al.  Statistical Properties of the GALEX-SDSS Matched Source Catalogs, and Classification of the UV Sources , 2006, astro-ph/0611926.

[11]  Tiziana Di Matteo,et al.  Simulations of the Sunyaev–Zel'dovich effect from quasars , 2008, 0808.0268.

[12]  The Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect from Quasar Feedback , 2007, astro-ph/0701750.

[13]  David N. Spergel,et al.  IMPROVING PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS USING GALAXY EVOLUTION EXPLORER OBSERVATIONS FOR THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY STRIPE 82 AND THE NEXT GENERATION OF OPTICAL AND SUNYAEV–ZELDOVICH CLUSTER SURVEYS , 2008 .