Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence, from the analysis of 132 fraud risk measurement exercises, of the average costs and rates of fraud. It advocates greater use of more accurate measurement which if monitored and repeated can secure reductions which could amount to a new competitive advantage.Design/methodology/approach – This paper has analysed 132 fraud risk measurement exercises from nine countries in a range of different sectors. Only those which assess a statistically valid sample which have sought and examined information indicating the presence of fraud, error or correctness in each case within that sample; have been completed and reported; have been externally validated; have a measurable level of statistical confidence; and have a measurable level of accuracy were included. Each exercise has been assessed to determine the percentage loss rate (PLR) and the fraud frequency rate (FFR). These data were analysed using Excel to determine average rates and further comparable dat...
[1]
Chris Lewis,et al.
Fraud typologies and the victims of fraud literature review
,
2009
.
[2]
Mark D. Button,et al.
Policing Fraud in the Private Sector: A Survey of the FTSE 100 Companies in the UK
,
2009
.
[3]
“Mind the gap”, progress towards developing anti‐fraud culture strategies in UK central government bodies
,
2009
.
[4]
Jim Gee,et al.
The resilience to fraud of UK plc
,
2009
.
[5]
K. Bussmann,et al.
Addressing Crime in Companies: First Findings from a Global Survey of Economic Crime
,
2006
.
[6]
Michael Levi,et al.
The nature, extent and economic impact of fraud in the UK
,
2007
.