Less is more? Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between readability and screening evaluations across pitch competition and crowdfunding contexts

Abstract We explore how the readability of an investment document influences new venture screening evaluations. Based on two field studies across pitch competition and crowdfunding contexts, we find that documents of high and low readability receive more favorable screening evaluations compared with those of medium readability. Our post-hoc experiment illustrates how the effect of readability is mediated by entrepreneurial capability and idea complexity. It appears that highly readable documents are generally valued because they make it easy for investors to process information, whereas less readable documents may be preferred because investors perceive the entrepreneurs to possess greater capability.

[1]  Emily J. Hopkins,et al.  Deconstructing the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.

[2]  George H. Haines,et al.  Private investors' investment criteria: Insights from qualitative data , 1999 .

[3]  Kenneth J. Merkley,et al.  The Effect of Annual Report Readability on Analyst Following and the Properties of Their Earnings Forecasts , 2011 .

[4]  Xiao-Jun Zhang,et al.  Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information , 2009 .

[5]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  Project description and crowdfunding success: an exploratory study , 2018, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[6]  Andrew Zacharakis,et al.  Attributes of Angel and Crowdfunded Investments as Determinants of VC Screening Decisions , 2017 .

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .

[8]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process , 1987 .

[9]  Armin Schwienbacher,et al.  Crowdfunding Models: Keep-It-All vs. All-Or-Nothing , 2019 .

[10]  Jack Gilliland,et al.  The concept of readability , 1968 .

[11]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  Do others think you have a viable business idea? Team diversity and judges' evaluation of ideas in a business plan competition , 2005 .

[12]  Tyzoon T. Tyebjee,et al.  A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity , 1984 .

[13]  D. Donaldson,et al.  It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension , 2007, Cognition.

[14]  The Effects of Reporting Complexity on Small and Large Investor Trading , 2010 .

[15]  Annaleena Parhankangas,et al.  How entrepreneurs seduce business angels: : An impression management approach , 2014 .

[16]  Peter E. Kennedy A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[17]  G. Dionigi,et al.  Web-based information on intraoperative neuromonitoring in thyroid surgery. , 2013, International journal of surgery.

[18]  David Kirsch,et al.  Form or Substance: The Role of Business Plans in Venture Capital Decision Making , 2009 .

[19]  Ethan Mollick,et al.  After the Campaign: Outcomes of Crowdfunding , 2014 .

[20]  Dushyantkumar Vyas,et al.  Analyst Report Readability , 2013 .

[21]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Matthew S. Wood,et al.  Making it personal: : Opportunity individuation and the shaping of opportunity beliefs , 2014 .

[23]  G. Meyer,et al.  The potential of actuarial decision models: Can they improve the venture capital investment decision? , 2000 .

[24]  A. Parhankangas,et al.  Crowdfunding Innovative Ideas: How Incremental and Radical Innovativeness Influence Funding Outcomes , 2017 .

[25]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Fortune favors the ( ): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes , 2011, Cognition.

[26]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐ and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research , 2016 .

[27]  H. Park,et al.  How images and color in business plans influence venture investment screening decisions , 2015 .

[28]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Venture capitalists' decision criteria in new venture evaluation , 1993 .

[29]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  Show me the money!: an analysis of project updates during crowdfunding campaigns , 2014, CHI.

[30]  Clinton S. Weeks,et al.  Shouting from the Ivory Tower: A Marketing Approach to Improve Communication of Academic Research to Entrepreneurs , 2014 .

[31]  Janne Virtala Spell it out! Limited attention and equity crowdfunding success , 2017 .

[32]  António Caetano,et al.  Recognizing Opportunities across Campus: The Effects of Cognitive Training and Entrepreneurial Passion on the Business Opportunity Prototype , 2018 .

[33]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  Venture Capitalists' Assessment of New Venture Survival , 1999 .

[34]  Ethan Mollick The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study , 2014 .

[35]  D. Jansen Mumbling with great incoherence: Was it really so difficult to understand Alan Greenspan? , 2011 .

[36]  Moren Lévesque,et al.  Business angel early stage decision making , 2011 .

[37]  J. Block,et al.  Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation? , 2016 .

[38]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[39]  S. Kotha,et al.  Entrepreneur Passion And Preparedness In Business Plan Presentations: A Persuasion Analysis Of Venture Capitalists' Funding Decisions , 2009 .

[40]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  A. Lawrence Individual investors and financial disclosure , 2013 .

[42]  Feng Li Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Earnings Persistence , 2008 .

[43]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[44]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[45]  Regulation and Financial Disclosure: The Impact of Plain English , 2013 .

[46]  R. Flesch A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Unintelligible Management Research and Academic Prestige , 1980 .

[48]  Pyayt P. Oo,et al.  Bellwether and the Herd? Unpacking the U-Shaped Relationship between Prior Funding and Subsequent Contributions in Reward-Based Crowdfunding , 2019 .