Introduction Conventional and unconventional hydrocarbons are likely to remain the main component of the energy mix needed to meet the growing global energy demand in the next 50 years. The worldwide production of crude oil could drop by nearly 40 million B/D by 2020 from existing projects, and an additional 25 million B/D of oil will need to be produced for the supply to keep pace with consumption. Scientific breakthroughs and technological innovations are needed, not only to secure supply of affordable hydrocarbons, but also to minimize the environmental impact of hydrocarbon recovery and utilization. The lifecycle of an oilfield is typically characterized by three main stages: production buildup, plateau production, and declining production. Sustaining the required production levels over the duration of the lifecycle requires a good understanding of and the ability to control the recovery mechanisms involved. For primary recovery (i.e., natural depletion of reservoir pressure), the lifecycle is generally short and the recovery factor does not exceed 20% in most cases. For secondary recovery, relying on either natural or artificial water or gas injection, the incremental recovery ranges from 15 to 25%. Globally, the overall recovery factors for combined primary and secondary recovery range between 35 and 45%. Increasing the recovery factor of maturing waterflooding projects by 10 to 30% could contribute significantly to the much-needed energy supply. To accomplish this, operators and service companies need to find ways to maximize recovery while minimizing operational costs and environmental imprint. This paper provides an overview of the options that oil and gas operators and service companies are considering as they look for solutions to the above needs and plan possible technology development scenarios. Emerging developments in such sciences as physics, chemistry, biotechnology, computing sciences, and nanotechnologies that are deemed capable of changing the hydrocarbon recovery game are highlighted.
[1]
G. Pope,et al.
Identification and Evaluation of High-Performance EOR Surfactants
,
2009
.
[2]
M. Ohadi,et al.
Applications of Micro and Nano Technologies in the Oil and Gas Industry - Overview of the Recent Progress
,
2010
.
[3]
C. D. Sherborn.
Geological Society of London: Lake v. Strahan
,
1902,
Geological Magazine.
[4]
Xiaofei Fu,et al.
Review of Practical Experience by Polymer Flooding at Daqing
,
2009
.
[5]
A. Nikolov,et al.
Thin liquid films containing micelles or nanoparticles
,
2008
.
[6]
Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.
Adjoint-based optimization of multi-phase flow through porous media – A review
,
2011
.
[7]
P. Zitha,et al.
Investigation of Immiscible and Miscible Foam for Enhancing Oil Recovery
,
2010
.
[8]
Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.
Three-dimensional saltwater-freshwater fingering in porous media: contrast agent MRI as basis for numerical simulations.
,
2007,
Magnetic resonance imaging.
[9]
A. R. Kovscek,et al.
Computed tomography in petroleum engineering research
,
2003,
Geological Society, London, Special Publications.
[10]
G. Jerauld,et al.
Improving Wateflood Recovery: LoSalTM EOR Field Evaluation
,
2008
.
[11]
R. S. Bryant,et al.
Review of microbial technology for improving oil recovery
,
1989
.
[12]
H. Nasr-El-Din,et al.
Recovery of residual oil using the alkali/surfactant/polymer process: effect of alkali concentration
,
1992
.