Grip forces when passing an object to a partner

The goal of the present study was to investigate how grip forces are applied when transferring stable control of an object from one person to another. We asked how grip forces would be modified by the passer to (1) control for inertial forces as the object was transported toward the receiver and (2) control for the impending perturbation when the receiver made contact with the object. Twelve volunteers worked in pairs during this experiment. One partner, playing the role of passer, transported an object with embedded load cells forward or held the object at an interception location. The second partner, playing the role of receiver, waited at an interception location or reached toward the passed object. Kinematic results indicated that while passers performed a stereotypical movement, receivers were sensitive to the motion of the object as they reached to make contact. Grip force results indicated that passers’ grip forces and grip/load force ratios were variable on a trial-to-trial basis, suggesting that a refined internal model of the passing task was not achieved within the timeframe of the experiment. Furthermore, a decoupling of the temporal and magnitude characteristics of the grip and inertial forces was noted in conditions where passers transported the object toward the receiver. During object transfer, it was noted that passers used visual feedback-based anticipatory control to precisely time initial grip force release, while somatosensory control was used by both the passer and receiver to precisely coordinate transfer rate.

[1]  M. Cutkosky,et al.  Manipulation Control with Dynamic Tactile Sensing , 1997 .

[2]  M. Kawato,et al.  Internal representations of the motor apparatus: implications from generalization in visuomotor learning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  R. Schmidt,et al.  A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[6]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Vision and motor control , 1992 .

[7]  B J McFadyen,et al.  Visuomotor control when reaching toward and grasping moving targets. , 1996, Acta psychologica.

[8]  A. M. Wing,et al.  Grip force dynamics in the approach to a collision , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990 .

[11]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Predictability influences finger force control when catching a free-falling object , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Moving objects with clumsy fingers: how predictive is grip force control in patients with impaired manual sensibility? , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  R. Johansson,et al.  Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  B Hopkins,et al.  The coordination of two-effector actions: spoon-feeding and intermanual prehension. , 1999, British journal of psychology.

[15]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Neural Control of Limb Mechanics for Visuomanual Coordination , 1996 .

[16]  D J Serrien,et al.  Bimanual organization of manipulative forces: evidence from erroneous feedforward programming of precision grip , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  Dennis A Nowak,et al.  Different modes of grip force control: voluntary and externally guided arm movements with a hand-held load , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Two-handed performance of a rhythmical fitts task by individuals and dyads. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[20]  Andrea H. Mason,et al.  Target viewing time and velocity effects on prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  H. Kinoshita,et al.  Individual finger forces acting on a grasped object during shaking actions. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[22]  C. E. Peper,et al.  Chapter 12 Predictive Visual Information Sources for the Regulation of Action with Special Emphasis on Catching and Hitting , 1992 .

[23]  Benoni B. Edin,et al.  Coordination of fingertip forces during human manipulation can emerge from independent neural networks controlling each engaged digit , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  C. Bard,et al.  Role of the feedforward command and reafferent information in the coordination of a passing prehension task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.