99mTc-Sestamibi Using a Direct Conversion Molecular Breast Imaging System to Assess Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Purpose The objective of this study was to determine the ability of breast imaging with 99mTc-sestamibi and a direct conversion–molecular breast imaging (MBI) system to predict early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods Patients undergoing NAC for breast cancer were imaged with a direct conversion–MBI system before (baseline), at 3 to 5 weeks after onset, and after completion of NAC. Tumor size and tumor-to-background (T/B) uptake ratio measured from MBI images were compared with extent of residual disease at surgery using the residual cancer burden. Results Nineteen patients completed imaging and proceeded to surgical resection after NAC. Mean reduction in T/B ratio from baseline to 3 to 5 weeks for patients classified as RCB-0 (no residual disease), RCB-1 and RCB-2 combined, and RCB-3 (extensive residual disease) was 56% (SD, 0.20), 28% (SD, 0.20), and 4% (SD, 0.15), respectively. The reduction in the RCB-0 group was significantly greater than in RCB-1/2 (P = 0.036) and RCB-3 (P = 0.001) groups. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for determining the presence or absence of residual disease was 0.88. Using a threshold of 50% reduction in T/B ratio at 3 to 5 weeks, MBI predicted presence of residual disease at surgery with a diagnostic accuracy of 89.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64%–0.99%), sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI, 0.74%–0.99%), and specificity of 83.3% (95% CI, 0.44%–0.99%). The reduction in tumor size at 3 to 5 weeks was not statistically different between RCB groups. Conclusions Changes in T/B ratio on MBI images performed at 3 to 5 weeks following initiation of NAC were accurate at predicting the presence or absence of residual disease at NAC completion.

[1]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Pre-treatment differences and early response monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review , 2012, European Radiology.

[2]  S. Rodenhuis,et al.  Association of primary tumour FDG uptake with clinical, histopathological and molecular characteristics in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  L. Esserman,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. , 2012, Radiology.

[4]  Robert W. Maxwell,et al.  Lexicon for standardized interpretation of gamma camera molecular breast imaging: observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  James A Young,et al.  Bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Marc Espié,et al.  Early monitoring of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT: defining a clinical aim , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  M. Ross,et al.  Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Accurate and Reduces the Need for Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[8]  D. Berry,et al.  I‐SPY 2: An Adaptive Breast Cancer Trial Design in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[9]  J. Baselga,et al.  Phase III trial evaluating the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, as adjuvant or primary systemic therapy: European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  B. Pogue,et al.  Prognostic imaging in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally-advanced breast cancer should be cost-effective , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[11]  D. Fuster,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Molecular breast imaging: use of a dual-head dedicated gamma camera to detect small breast tumors. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Christos Hatzis,et al.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Molecular breast imaging: advantages and limitations of a scintimammographic technique in patients with small breast tumors. , 2007, The breast journal.

[15]  Michael K. O'Connor,et al.  Molecular breast imaging using a dedicated high-performance instrument , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[16]  S. Singletary,et al.  Accuracy of Physical Examination, Ultrasonography, and Mammography in Predicting Residual Pathologic Tumor Size in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[17]  Rachel F Brem,et al.  Occult breast cancer: scintimammography with high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera in women at high risk for breast cancer. , 2005, Radiology.

[18]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Comparison of small field of view gamma camera systems for scintimammography , 2005, Nuclear medicine communications.

[19]  T. Julian,et al.  Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  D. Wickerham,et al.  The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Rainer Linke,et al.  18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography for monitoring breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a comparative study , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  L. K. Harding,et al.  Adsorption of radiopharmaceuticals to syringes leads to lower administered activity than intended , 2001, Nuclear medicine communications.

[23]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[24]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Monitoring the response of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using [technetium 99m]‐sestamibi scintimammography , 1999, Cancer.

[25]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  Robert W. Maxwell,et al.  Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part II. Evaluation in patients. , 2012, Medical physics.

[28]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.