Digital Curation Vignettes: Personal, Academic, and Organizational Digital Information

panel presents variations on the theme of digital curation by examining the digital information management and preservation practices of three different populations. Personal digital information management, personal collections transferred to institutional repositories, and a digital archiving case in a private organization, offer a wide view of the types of contexts in which digital material is being produced "in the wild." Across the cases we found that digital record-keeping and preservation practices are not well understood or established, and that a vast amount of digital content created currently is at risk. Other issues, such as an individual's perception of digital information value, and the feasibility of preservation beyond an individual's or organization's lifetime, surfaced as determinants of the current situation. The findings have important implications for appraisal and post-custodial archival strategies. They are also useful for identifying critical decision points when digital curation issues are best addressed.

[1]  M. Hedstrom It's about time: research challenges in digital archiving and long term preservation, I: Final report , 2004 .

[2]  Christos Douligeris,et al.  Securing Digital Content , 2007 .

[3]  William G. LeFurgy Building Preservation Partnerships: The Library of Congress National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program , 2005, Libr. Trends.

[4]  Terry Kuny The digital dark ages? Challenges in the preservation of electronic information , 1998 .

[5]  Reijo Savolainen Information source horizons and source preferences of environmental activists: A social phenomenological approach , 2007 .

[7]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Seeking information, seeking connections, seeking meaning: genealogists and family historians , 2004, Inf. Res..

[8]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  The Long Term Fate of Our Digital Belongings: Toward a Service Model for Personal Archives , 2006, Archiving Conference.

[9]  Sheila Anderson,et al.  Digital repositories review , 2005 .

[10]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of DSpace , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[11]  Seamus Ross,et al.  Preservation research and sustainable digital libraries , 2005, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[12]  Susan Gibbons,et al.  Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories , 2005, D Lib Mag..

[13]  Clifford A. Lynch,et al.  Academic Institutional Repositories: Deployment Status in 13 Nations as of Mid 2005 , 2005, D-Lib Magazine.

[14]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  Source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Maria Esteva,et al.  The aleph in the archive : appraisal and preservation of a natural electronic archive , 2008 .

[16]  J. Kari,et al.  Placing the Internet in information source horizons. A study of information seeking by Internet users in the context of self-development , 2004 .

[17]  R. Gould,et al.  Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. , 1997 .

[18]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .