A comparison among FE models to simulate metallic foams forming – An experimental validation

Abstract Metallic foams are new materials mainly produced by expansion in a proper chamber and mainly characterized by internal voids: a material characterized by a very low density is obtained in this way. A lot of foamed components are commonly produced, directly by injecting a gas or foaming agent into molten metal inside a closed die. However, secondary operations on these materials can play an important role in order to enhance the foam production flexibility. From the above considerations, the deformation behaviour of an aluminium foam was investigated by compression tests. The study compares three different numerical analyses highlighting their points of strength and weakness in order to verify their applicability in process design. More in detail, two models based on the implicit formulation were investigated; in one case, the billet material was set as porous object with the material density which was calculated and updated as part of the simulation. The second implicit analysis, instead, was built using the plastic material formulation; the porosity, in this case, was physically created introducing voids within the workpiece. The latter simulation class was carried out through an explicit investigation; an efficient model construction was proposed introducing spherical surfaces connected each other with plans. Experimental data were used to validate the calculated results and a discussion concerning the three different numerical analyses was finally reported.

[1]  D. Dunand,et al.  Microstructure evolution during solid-state foaming of titanium , 2003 .

[2]  J. Banhart,et al.  Deformation characteristics of metal foams , 1998 .

[3]  D. Umbrello,et al.  Forging of metallic foams to reproduce biomechanical components , 2008 .

[4]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Aluminum foams produced by liquid-state processes , 1998 .

[5]  L. C. Brinson,et al.  Finite element modeling of porous titanium , 2007, International Journal of Solids and Structures.

[6]  M. A. Elbestawi,et al.  On the FE Modeling of Closed-cell Aluminum Foam , 2005 .

[7]  Susumu Shima,et al.  Plasticity theory for porous metals , 1976 .

[8]  F. Micari,et al.  Forming of aluminum foam sandwich panels: Numerical simulations and experimental tests , 2006 .

[9]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Constitutive modeling of aluminum foam including fracture and statistical variation of density , 2003 .

[10]  Robert F. Singer,et al.  Processing of Metal Foams—Challenges and Opportunities , 2000 .

[11]  Dyi-Cheng Chen Rigid-plastic finite element analysis of plastic deformation of porous metal sheets containing internal void defects , 2006 .

[12]  John W. Gillespie,et al.  Dynamics of metal foam deformation during Taylor cylinder–Hopkinson bar impact experiment , 2003 .

[13]  D. Umbrello,et al.  On the Finite Element Simulation of Secondary Operations on Metallic Foams , 2007 .

[14]  David C. Dunand,et al.  Numerical modeling of pore size and distribution in foamed titanium , 2006 .

[15]  Hilary Bart-Smith,et al.  On the mechanical performance of closed cell Al alloy foams , 1997 .

[16]  L. Froyen,et al.  Mechanical analysis and microstructural characterisation of metal foams , 2002 .

[17]  SIMULATION OF ALUMINUM FOAM BEHAVIOR IN COMPRESSION TESTS , 2009 .

[18]  J. Banhart Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams , 2001 .

[19]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams , 2002 .

[20]  K. Manisekar,et al.  Effect of friction on barrelling in square billets of aluminium during cold upset forging , 2006 .

[21]  N. El-Abbasi,et al.  FE modelling of deformation localization in metallic foams , 2002 .

[22]  P. Kenesei,et al.  The influence of cell-size distribution on the plastic deformation in metal foams , 2004 .

[23]  M. F. Ashby,et al.  Potential applications for steel and titanium metal foams , 2005 .