Dosimetric impact of intrafraction changes in MR-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE To assess changes in implant and treatment volumes through the course of a prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy procedure and their impact on plan quality metrics. METHODS AND MATERIALS Sixteen MRI-guided high-dose-rate procedures included a post-treatment MR (ptMR) immediately after treatment delivery (135 min between MR scans). Target and organs at risk (OARs) were contoured, and catheters were reconstructed. The delivered treatment plan was applied to the ptMR image set. Volumes and dosimetric parameters in the ptMR were evaluated and compared with the delivered plan using a paired two-tailed t-test with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS An average increase of 8.9% in prostate volume was observed for whole-gland treatments, resulting in reduction in coverage for both prostate and planning target volume, reflected in decreased V100 (mean 3.3% and 4.6%, respectively, p < 0.05), and D90 (mean 7.1% and 7.6%, respectively, of prescription dose, p < 0.05). There was no significant change in doses to OARs. For partial-gland treatments, there was an increase in planning target volume (9.1%), resulting in reduced coverage and D90 (mean 3.6% and 12.4%, respectively, p < 0.05). A decrease in D0.5cc for bladder (3%, p < 0.05) was observed, with no significant changes in dose to other OARs. CONCLUSIONS Volumetric changes were observed during the time between planning MR and ptMR. Nonetheless, treatment plans for both whole- and partial-gland therapies remained clinically acceptable. These results apply to clinical settings in which patients remain in the same position and under anesthesia during the entire treatment process.

[1]  Alexandra Rink,et al.  Lessons learned using an MRI-only workflow during high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. , 2016, Brachytherapy.

[2]  P. Hoskin,et al.  High dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for prostate cancer: catheter and gland movement between fractions. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Alexandra Rink,et al.  Dosimetric feasibility of ablative dose escalated focal monotherapy with MRI-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  Navid Samavati,et al.  Effect of material property heterogeneity on biomechanical modeling of prostate under deformation. , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Prostate volume changes during permanent seed brachytherapy: an analysis of intra-operative variations, predictive factors and clinical implication , 2013, Radiation oncology.

[6]  David A Jaffray,et al.  A facility for magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[7]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Accuracy and sensitivity of finite element model-based deformable registration of the prostate. , 2008, Medical physics.

[8]  Hans T. Chung,et al.  Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: Early toxicity and quality-of life results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19Gy or two fractions of 13.5Gy. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  S. van Dyk,et al.  Direct 2-arm comparison shows benefit of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost vs external beam radiation therapy alone for prostate cancer. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Marinus A Moerland,et al.  Edema and Seed Displacements Affect Intraoperative Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy Dosimetry. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  J. Crook,et al.  Dose escalation to dominant intraprostatic lesions with MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion High-Dose-Rate prostate brachytherapy. Prospective phase II trial. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  F. Waterman,et al.  Impact of oedema on implant geometry and dosimetry for temporary high dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate. , 2003, Australasian radiology.

[13]  Glen Gejerman,et al.  Analysis of serial CT scans to assess template and catheter movement in prostate HDR brachytherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Dosimetric impact of interfraction catheter movement in high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Jung Kim,et al.  Local property characterization of prostate glands using inhomogeneous modeling based on tumor volume and location analysis , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[16]  May Whitaker,et al.  Prostate HDR brachytherapy catheter displacement between planning and treatment delivery. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  Ivan Yeung,et al.  Sequential evaluation of prostate edema after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy using CT-MRI fusion. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Gerry Lowe,et al.  Justification for inter-fraction correction of catheter movement in fractionated high dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of prostate cancer. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.