Preliminary Experiences with "Flipping" a Facility Layout/Material Handling Course

We are employing the “flipped classroom” teaching and learning approach in a required junior-level ind ustrial engineering course on facility layout and material handling. In the “flipped classroom,” students use out-of-class time to watch lectures available online. This free s class time for problem solving, active learning, or difficult topics, for which the instructor serves as an on-demand con sultant or advisor. To prepare for flipping this c lass in the spring of 2014, the instructor conducted a pilot th e previous spring by “flipping” three lecture perio ds. In a student evaluation of the pilot in which over 90% responded , nearly 65% preferred in-class problem solving to traditional lecture. Frequently-stated benefits were the in-cl ass accessibility of the instructor and the ability to re-watch videos. The College and University Classroom Environment Inventory was administered both before the pilot and during the full classroom flip to measure changes in stude nt perceptions, and significant differences in seve ral dimensions closely related to the flipped classroom were obser ved. Also, using the Teaching Dimensions Observation Protocol, we observed an increase in active learning components within the flipped relative to the pre-flipped c ourse, as strived for. The experiences of the instructor in flipping this IE course will also be discussed.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha , 1997 .

[2]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[3]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Teaching practices of engineering faculty: Perceptions and actual behavior , 2011 .

[4]  Jeremy F. Strayer How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation , 2012 .

[5]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  EMPLOYING THE CLASSROOM FLIP TO MOVE "LECTURE" OUT OF THE CLASSROOM , 2012 .

[6]  Matthew T. Hora,et al.  Findings from classroom observations of 58 math and science faculty , 2012 .

[7]  Matthew T. Hora,et al.  Instructional Systems of Practice: A Multidimensional Analysis of Math and Science Undergraduate Course Planning and Classroom Teaching , 2013 .

[8]  Marija J. Norusis,et al.  SPSS 16.0 Statistical Procedures Companion , 2003 .

[9]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Validity and use of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment in higher education , 1986 .

[10]  M. Tavakol,et al.  Making sense of Cronbach's alpha , 2011, International journal of medical education.

[11]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  "flipping" the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course , 2009 .

[12]  Halil Yurdugül,et al.  MINIMUM SAMPLE SIZE FOR CRONBACH'S COEFFICIENT ALPHA: A MONTE-CARLO STUDY CRONBACH ALFA KATSAYISI İÇİN MİNİMUM ÖRNEKLEM GENİŞLİĞİ: MONTE-CARLO ÇALIŞMASI , 2008 .

[13]  Patricia M. King,et al.  Learning Partnerships: Theory and Models of Practice to Educate for Self-Authorship (review) , 2005 .

[14]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[15]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .