Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine.

STUDY DESIGN A comparative study on the position of pedicle screws in patients treated surgically with and without computer assistance. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw installation, and to evaluate its clinical benefit as compared with conventional pedicle screw installation techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA In vitro and clinical studies have documented a significant rate of misplaced screws in the thoracolumbar area. Neurologic complications are recognized problems caused by screw misplacement. METHODS Patients treated surgically with computer assistance were compared with a historical control group of patients treated surgically with conventional techniques in the same hospital and by the same surgical team. All screw positions were measured with a postoperative magnetic resonance tomography, and cortical effractions were categorized in 2-mm increments. Patients' charts also were reviewed to assess individual neurologic outcomes. RESULTS The control cohort was composed of 100 patients, with 544 screws from T5 to S1. The computer-assisted cohort was composed of 50 patients, with 294 screws from T2 to S1. In the control cohort, 461 of 544 screws (85%) were found completely within their pedicles as compared with 278 of 294 screws (95%) correctly placed in the computer-assisted group (P < 0.0001). All 16 screws incorrectly placed with computer assistance were found 0.1 mm to 2 mm from the pedicle cortex. In the control cohort, 68 screws were found 0.1 mm to 2 mm, 10 screws 2.1 mm to 4 mm, and 5 screws more than 4 mm from the pedicle cortex. Seven patients in the control cohort were surgically retreated because of postoperative neurologic deficits, whereas no patients in the computer-assisted group were surgically retreated. CONCLUSIONS Computer assistance can decrease the incidence of incorrectly positioned pedicle screws.

[1]  N. Glossop,et al.  Assessment of Vertebral Body Motion During Spine Surgery , 1997, Spine.

[2]  S R Garfin,et al.  Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Spinal Pedicle Fixation: Reliability and Validity of Roentgenogram-Based Assessment and Surgical Factors on Successful Screw Placement , 1988, Spine.

[4]  N. Glossop,et al.  Computer‐Aided Pedicle Screw Placement Using Frameless Stereotaxis , 1996, Spine.

[5]  W. Castro,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Vertebrae , 1996, Spine.

[6]  K. Vosburgh,et al.  In Vitro Simulation: Early Results of Stereotaxy for Pedicle Screw Placement , 1997, Spine.

[7]  S. Esses,et al.  Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. , 1993, Spine.

[8]  G H Barnett,et al.  Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  H Labelle,et al.  Computer‐Assisted Pedicle Screw Fixation‐ A Feasibility Study , 1995, Spine.

[10]  Magnetic resonance imaging of titanium anterior cervical spine plating systems. , 1995 .

[11]  D. E. Casey Jones,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Fusions by Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography , 1995, Spine.

[12]  C. Dickman,et al.  A Historical Cohort Study of Pedicle Screw Fixation in Thoracic, Lumbar, and Sacral Spinal Fusions. , 1994, Spine.

[13]  C. Dickman,et al.  Surgical treatment alternatives for fixation of unstable fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A meta-analysis. , 1994, Spine.

[14]  P. Cinquin,et al.  Computer-assisted spine surgery. , 1998, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[15]  J. Dvořák,et al.  Historical Perspectives: Wilhelm Schulthess , 1994 .

[16]  F. Langlotz,et al.  Accuracy of Computer‐Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: An In Vivo Computed Tomography Analysis , 1997, Spine.

[17]  J. Thalgott,et al.  Four year experience with the AO Anterior Thoracolumbar Locking Plate , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[18]  S. Gertzbein,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicular Screw Placement In Vivo , 1990, Spine.

[19]  C. Petersilge,et al.  Accuracy of Using Computed Tomography to Identify Pedicle Screw Placement in Cadaveric Human Lumbar Spine , 1997, Spine.

[20]  D. Bradford,et al.  Complications of the Variable Screw Plate Pedicle Screw Fixation , 1991, Spine.

[21]  L. Nolte,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion With Computer-Assisted Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial of 30 Patients , 1997, Spine.

[22]  Frank Langlotz,et al.  Image‐Guided Insertion of Transpedicular Screws: A Laboratory Set‐Up , 1995, Spine.

[23]  M. Yahiro.  Comprehensive literature review. Pedicle screw fixation devices. , 1994, Spine.

[24]  V K Goel,et al.  Bone registration method for robot assisted surgery: Pedicle screw insertion , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[25]  R. A. Silver,et al.  An Analysis of Differential Epidural Spinal Anesthesia and Pentothal Pain Study in the Differential Diagnosis of Back Pain: Aids in Avoiding Unnecessary Back Surgery , 1979, Spine.

[26]  H. Halm,et al.  Pedicle Screw Instrumentation of the Thoracic Spine in Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1997, Spine.

[27]  L Zamorano,et al.  Image-guided computer-assisted spine surgery: a pilot study on pedicle screw fixation. , 1996, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[28]  R. Roy-Camille,et al.  [Osteosynthesis of dorsal, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine with metallic plates screwed into vertebral pedicles and articular apophyses]. , 1970, La Presse medicale.