Reduction of the value of information sharing as demand becomes strongly auto-correlated

Information sharing has been identified, in the academic literature, as one of the most important levers to mitigate the bullwhip effect in supply chains. A highly-cited article on the bullwhip effect has claimed that the percentage inventory reduction resulting from information sharing in a two level supply chain, when the downstream demand is autoregressive of order one, is an increasing function of the autoregressive parameter of the demand. In this paper we show that this is true only for a certain range of the autoregressive parameter and there is a maximum value beyond which the bullwhip ratio at the upstream stage is reduced and the percentage inventory reduction resulting from information sharing decreases towards zero. We also show that this maximum value of the autoregressive parameter can be as high as 0.7 which represents a common value that may be encountered in many practical contexts. This means that large benefits of information sharing cannot be assumed for those Stock Keeping Units (SKUs) with highly positively auto-correlated demand. Instead, equally careful analysis is needed for these items as for those SKUs with less strongly auto-correlated demand.

[1]  M. Dresner,et al.  The Inventory Value of Information Sharing, Continuous Replenishment, and Vendor-Managed Inventory , 2008 .

[2]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information sharing in a supply chain , 2000, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[3]  Jian Jhen Chen,et al.  Coordination of information sharing in a supply chain , 2013 .

[4]  M. Dresner,et al.  Beyond Information Sharing: An Empirical Analysis of Vendor‐Managed Inventory , 2014 .

[5]  M. Naim,et al.  Assessing the impact of e-business on supply chain dynamics , 2004 .

[6]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  The impact of information enrichment on the Bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Benny Van Houdt,et al.  Characterizing order processes of continuous review (s, S) and (r, nQ) policies , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Xiaolong Zhang.  The impact of forecasting methods on the bullwhip effect , 2004 .

[9]  Sridhar Seshadri,et al.  Information Sharing in a Supply Chain Under ARMA Demand , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[10]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  The impact of information sharing in a two-level supply chain with multiple retailers , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  The value of coordination in a two-echelon supply chain , 2008 .

[12]  S. Disney,et al.  On variance amplification in a three-echelon supply chain with minimum mean square error forecasting , 2022 .

[13]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Managing Supply Chain Demand Variability with Scheduled Ordering Policies , 1999 .

[14]  John E. Boylan,et al.  Feasibility principles for Downstream Demand Inference in supply chains , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  Kenneth Gilbert,et al.  An ARIMA Supply Chain Model , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[16]  W. H. Hausman,et al.  Optimal centralized ordering policies in multi-echelon inventory systems with correlated demands , 1990 .

[17]  Panos Kouvelis,et al.  Supply Chain Management Research and Production and Operations Management: Review, Trends, and Opportunities , 2006 .

[18]  Elie Ofek,et al.  Manufacturer Benefits from Information Integration with Retail Customers , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Huynh Trung Luong,et al.  Measure of bullwhip effect in supply chains with autoregressive demand process , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Jose M. Framiñan,et al.  On bullwhip-limiting strategies in divergent supply chain networks , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  Is there a benefit to sharing market sales information? Linking theory and practice , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  Reza Zanjirani Farahani,et al.  New forecasting insights on the bullwhip effect in a supply chain , 2014 .

[23]  Srinivasan Raghunathan,et al.  Impact of demand correlation on the value of and incentives for information sharing in a supply chain , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Jose M. Framinan,et al.  Inventory policies and information sharing in multi-echelon supply chains , 2011 .

[25]  Yaman Barlas,et al.  Demand forecasting and sharing strategies to reduce fluctuations and the bullwhip effect in supply chains , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  M. Z. Babai,et al.  Intermittent demand forecasting: An empirical study on accuracy and the risk of obsolescence , 2014 .

[27]  S. Cannella.  Order-Up-To policies in Information Exchange supply chains , 2014 .

[28]  Aris A. Syntetos,et al.  Forecasting and Inventory Performance in a Two-Stage Supply Chain with ARIMA(0,1,1) Demand: Theory and Empirical Analysis , 2013 .

[29]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Supply chain practice and information sharing , 2007 .

[30]  John E. Boylan,et al.  On the effect of non-optimal forecasting methods on supply chain downstream demand , 2012 .

[31]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information , 2000 .

[32]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain , 2000 .

[33]  Sunil Agrawal,et al.  Impact of information sharing and lead time on bullwhip effect and on-hand inventory , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information sharing in a supply chain , 2000, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[35]  S. Disney.  Supply chain aperiodicity, bullwhip and stability analysis with Jury's inners , 2008 .

[36]  Juan R. Trapero,et al.  Impact of Information Exchange on Supplier Forecasting Performance , 2012 .

[37]  A. Syntetos,et al.  Forecast errors and inventory performance under forecast information sharing , 2012 .

[38]  Elena Ciancimino,et al.  On the Bullwhip Avoidance Phase: supply chain collaboration and order smoothing , 2010 .

[39]  Xiaolong Zhang,et al.  Technical Note: Evolution of ARMA Demand in Supply Chains , 2004, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[40]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Modelling the benefits of information sharing-based partnerships in a two-level supply chain , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[41]  J. Machuca,et al.  THE IMPACT OF ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE ON REDUCING BULLWHIP EFFECT AND SUPPLY CHAIN INVENTORY COSTS , 2004 .

[42]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[43]  Hong Yan,et al.  Benefits of information sharing with supply chain partnerships , 2001, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[44]  Sven F. Crone,et al.  Forecasting and operational research: a review , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[45]  M. Sodhi,et al.  Quantifying the effect of batch size and order errors on the bullwhip effect using simulation , 2004 .

[46]  Jose M. Framiñan,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics On the Bullwhip Avoidance Phase : The Synchronised Supply Chain , 2012 .

[47]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[48]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  On Replenishment Rules, Forecasting, and the Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains , 2008, Found. Trends Technol. Inf. Oper. Manag..