Quantum-mechanical machinery for rational decision-making in classical guessing game

In quantum game theory, one of the most intriguing and important questions is, “Is it possible to get quantum advantages without any modification of the classical game?” The answer to this question so far has largely been negative. So far, it has usually been thought that a change of the classical game setting appears to be unavoidable for getting the quantum advantages. However, we give an affirmative answer here, focusing on the decision-making process (we call ‘reasoning’) to generate the best strategy, which may occur internally, e.g., in the player’s brain. To show this, we consider a classical guessing game. We then define a one-player reasoning problem in the context of the decision-making theory, where the machinery processes are designed to simulate classical and quantum reasoning. In such settings, we present a scenario where a rational player is able to make better use of his/her weak preferences due to quantum reasoning, without any altering or resetting of the classically defined game. We also argue in further analysis that the quantum reasoning may make the player fail, and even make the situation worse, due to any inappropriate preferences.

[1]  E. Diamanti,et al.  Nonlocality and conflicting interest games. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[2]  S. Hart,et al.  Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications , 1992 .

[3]  Signatures of quantum behavior in single-qubit weak measurements. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[4]  Guy Louchard,et al.  The Guessing Secrets problem: a probabilistic approach , 2005, J. Algorithms.

[5]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[6]  S. Balakrishnan,et al.  Classical rules and quantum strategies in penny flip game , 2013, Quantum Inf. Process..

[7]  Jens Eisert,et al.  Quantum games , 2000 .

[8]  Noah Linden,et al.  Connection between Bell nonlocality and Bayesian game theory , 2012, Nature Communications.

[9]  Julian F. Miller,et al.  Representation of Boolean quantum circuits as reed–Muller expansions , 2003, quant-ph/0305134.

[10]  A. Cabello Kochen-Specker theorem for a single qubit using positive operator-valued measures. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[11]  J. Eisert,et al.  Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9806088.

[12]  Jinhyoung Lee,et al.  A quantum speedup in machine learning: finding an N-bit Boolean function for a classification , 2013, 1303.6055.

[13]  Susanne Hertz,et al.  Polarization Optics In Telecommunications , 2016 .

[14]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[15]  L. Vaidman,et al.  Quantum advantages in classically defined tasks , 2008 .

[16]  Edward W. Piotrowski,et al.  An Invitation to Quantum Game Theory , 2002, ArXiv.

[17]  S. Aaronson Read the fine print , 2015, Nature Physics.

[18]  Scott Aaronson,et al.  Quantum Machine Learning Algorithms : Read the Fine Print , 2015 .

[19]  S. J. van Enk,et al.  Classical rules in quantum games , 2002 .

[20]  Hong Guo,et al.  A survey of quantum games , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  R. Schack,et al.  Classical model for bulk-ensemble NMR quantum computation , 1999, quant-ph/9903101.

[22]  Frank Thomson Leighton,et al.  Guessing secrets , 2001, SODA '01.

[23]  Jinhyoung Lee,et al.  Operational quasiprobabilities for qudits , 2012, 1206.6986.

[24]  Ross D. Shachter,et al.  Decision Making Using Probabilistic Inference Methods , 1992, UAI.

[25]  van Enk Quantum and classical game strategies , 2000 .

[26]  A. Grudka,et al.  Is there contextuality for a single qubit? , 2007, Physical review letters.

[27]  Jörgen W. Weibull,et al.  Evolutionary Game Theory , 1996 .

[28]  M. Bourennane,et al.  Quantum Bidding in Bridge , 2014, 1403.4280.

[29]  M. A. Lohe,et al.  An analysis of the quantum penny flip game using geometric algebra , 2009, 0902.4296.

[30]  Colin Benjamin,et al.  Do quantum strategies always win? A case study in the entangled quantum penny flip game , 2014, ArXiv.

[31]  Andrew N Jordan,et al.  Leggett-Garg inequality with a kicked quantum pump. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[32]  D. Meyer Quantum strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9804010.

[33]  Neil Johnson,et al.  Efficiency and formalism of quantum games , 2003 .