Teaching and Learning Online: Assessing the Effect of Gender Context on Active Learning

ABSTRACT Advocates of computer-mediated instruction have pointed to the potential of online teaching for facilitating students’ active learning behavior. Small-group online discussion can have a role in meaningful student interaction. Yet, what is less known are the conditions under which students actually engage in interaction in online discussion groups rather than posting monologues. We refer to the literature that posits that gender is a variable affecting students' online discussion behavior. Existing literature suggests that the use of gender-specific language in online interactions is highly context-dependent. Of particular interest is the extent to which the manifestation of gender-typical rhetorical styles and student–student interaction are shaped by the gender composition of the online group. Our data, obtained from student postings to 50 discussion groups in three different upper-level comparative politics courses taught by two different instructors in multiple sections, permitted us to perform a content analysis of 1,908 messages containing 14,442 statements made by 453 students. In addition to suggesting overall differences and surprising similarities between male and female discussion styles, our preliminary findings point toward the productive effects of mixed-gender discussion groups.

[1]  T. L. Barton,et al.  Teaching English in the Two-Year College. , 1971 .

[2]  D. Bonge,et al.  Sex differences in self-disclosure. , 1985 .

[3]  Simeon J. Yates.  Gender, identity and CMC , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Impacts of Asynchronous Learning Networks on Individual and Group Problem Solving: A Field Experiment , 1999 .

[5]  Linda M. Harasim,et al.  Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment , 1990 .

[6]  Cheris Kramarae.  The third shift , 2001 .

[7]  Tisha Bender,et al.  Discussion-Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning: Theory, Practice and Assessment , 2003 .

[8]  D. Boud,et al.  Learners still learn from experience when online , 2018, Teaching & Learning Online.

[9]  M. Szymanski.  American Association of University Women Educational Foundation , 2020, The Grants Register 2022.

[10]  Mary Anne Devanna.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[11]  David R. Brake.  LOST IN CYBERSPACE , 1997 .

[12]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Groups, Tasks, and Technology , 1993 .

[13]  Richard T. Herschel,et al.  The Impact of Varying Gender Composition on Group Brainstorming Performance in a GSS Environment , 1994 .

[14]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  M. Allen,et al.  Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Gender and self-disclosure revisited: personal and contextual variations in self-disclosure to same-sex acquaintances. , 1992, The Journal of social psychology.

[17]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Using IT to Reengineer Business Education: An Exploratory Investigation of Collaborative Telelearning , 1995, MIS Q..

[18]  Todd M. Davis,et al.  Turning Teaching into Learning. The Role of Student Responsibility in the Collegiate Experience. ERIC Digest. , 1994 .

[19]  T. Postmes,et al.  Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality? , 2002 .

[20]  Vic Lally,et al.  Gender differences in an on-line learning environment , 1999, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[21]  Ravi S. Behara,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Electronic Groups in the Classroom , 1998 .

[22]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[23]  R. Clawson,et al.  Explaining Participation on a Class Newsgroup , 1999 .

[24]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994, MIS Q..

[25]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[26]  Michael Thoennessen,et al.  Impact of Asynchronous Learning Networks in Large Lecture Classes , 1999 .

[27]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Media Effects and Communication Bias in Diverse Groups , 1997 .

[28]  Ashley M. Sieman.  Discussion-Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning: Theory, Practice and Assessment (review) , 2005 .

[29]  Gayle J. Yaverbaum,et al.  Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication versus Face-to-face Collaboration: Results on Student Learning, Quality and Satisfaction , 1999 .

[30]  V. Savicki,et al.  Gender Language Style and Group Composition in Internet Discussion Groups , 2006 .

[31]  Zoe M. Oxley,et al.  Online Discussions Across Three Universities: Student Participation and Pedagogy , 2002, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[32]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  Testing Claims for On-Line Conferences , 1991 .

[33]  Scott L. Althaus.  Please Scroll down for Article Communication Education Computer-mediated Communication in the University Classroom: an Experiment with On-line Discussions , 2022 .

[34]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Gender and Democracy in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[35]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[36]  Bruce M. Wilson,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Internet Teaching: Preliminary Evidence from American National Government Classes , 2002, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[37]  A. Mulac,et al.  Male/female language differences and effects in same‐sex and mixed‐sex dyads: The gender‐linked language effect , 1988 .

[38]  Mark A. Shields,et al.  Lost in Cyberspace? , 1996 .

[39]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[40]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[41]  Joanna Wolfe,et al.  Why do women feel lgnored? gender differences in computer-mediated classroom interactions , 1999 .

[42]  Joanna Wolfe.  Gender, Ethnicity, and Classroom Discourse , 2000 .

[43]  Kerstin Hamann,et al.  Beyond Search Engines: Enhancing Active Learning Using the Internet , 2003 .