On the Pathophysiology of Migraine—Links for “Empirically Based Treatment” with Neurofeedback

Psychophysiological data support the concept that migraine is the result of cortical hypersensitivity, hyperactivity, and a lack of habituation. There is evidence that this is a brain-stem related information processing dysfunction. This cortical activity reflects a periodicity between 2 migraine attacks and it may be due to endogenous or exogenous factors. In the few days preceding the next attack slow cortical potentials are highest and habituation delay experimentally recorded during contingent negative variation is at a maximum. These striking features of slow cortical potentials are predictors of the next attack. The pronounced negativity can be fed back to the patient. The data support the hypothesis that a change in amplitudes of slow cortical potentials is caused by altered habituation during the recording session. This kind of neurofeedback can be characterized as “empirically based” because it improves habituation and it proves to be clinically efficient.

[1]  U. Stephani,et al.  Migraine – evidence for a disturbance of cerebral maturation in man? , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  M. Moskowitz Neurogenic inflammation in the pathophysiology and treatment of migraine , 1993, Neurology.

[3]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Slow cortical potential biofeedback and the startle reflex , 1994, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[4]  Thomas Elbert,et al.  SLOW CORTICAL POTENTIALS REFLECT THE REGULATION OF CORTICAL EXCITABILITY , 1993 .

[5]  G. D'andrea,et al.  Event-Related Slow Potentials and Associated Catecholamine Function in Migraine , 1990, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[6]  W. Wang,et al.  Interictal potentiation of passive "oddball" auditory event-related potentials in migraine. , 1998, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[7]  M. Anthony New notes on migraine , 1988 .

[8]  M. Moskowitz The visceral organ brain , 1991, Neurology.

[9]  J. Schoenen Abnormal cortical information processing between migraine attacks , 1996 .

[10]  P. Goadsby Current concepts of the pathophysiology of migraine. , 1997, Neurologic clinics.

[11]  K. Welch,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation confirms hyperexcitability of occipital cortex in migraine , 1998, Neurology.

[12]  C. Weiller,et al.  Brain stem activation in spontaneous human migraine attacks , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[13]  N Birbaumer,et al.  Memory performance and area-specific self-regulation of slow cortical potentials: dual-task interference. , 1993, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[14]  J. Hardebo A Cortical Excitatory Wave May Cause Both The Aura and The Headache of Migraine , 1992, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[15]  R. Oades,et al.  Development and topography of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs): mismatch and processing negativity in individuals 8-22 years of age. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[16]  P. Kropp,et al.  Is Increased Amplitude of Contingent Negative Variation in Migraine Due to Cortical Hyperactivity or to Reduced Habituation? , 1993, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[17]  J. Schoenen β Blockers and the Central Nervous System , 1986, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[18]  M. Ferrari Biochemistry of migraine. , 1992, Pathologie-biologie.

[19]  S. Evers,et al.  Dynamic Changes of Cognitive Habituation and Serotonin Metabolism During the Migraine Interval , 1999, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[20]  K. Welch,et al.  MRI of the occipital cortex, red nucleus, and substantia nigra during visual aura of migraine , 1998, Neurology.

[21]  J. Schoenen,et al.  Biobehavioral correlates in migraine: the role of hypersensitivity and information-processing dysfunction. , 1998, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[22]  M. Timsit-Berthier,et al.  Contingent negative variation in headache , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[23]  P. Kropp,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation During Migraine Attack and Interval: Evidence for Normalization of Slow Cortical Potentials During the Attack , 1995, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[24]  I. Ahmed Contingent Negative Variation in Migraine: Effect of Beta Blocker Therapy , 1999, Clinical EEG.

[25]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Age increases brain complexity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  B. Rockstroh Slow cortical potentials and behavior , 1989 .

[27]  J. Rohrbaugh,et al.  ERPs associated with preparatory and movement-related processes. A review. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[28]  H. Göbel,et al.  Comparison of Contingent Negative Variation Between Migraine Interval and Migraine Attack Before and After Treatment With Sumatriptan , 1993, Headache.

[29]  M. Lauritzen Cortical Spreading Depression in Migraine , 2001, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[30]  N. Ramadan,et al.  Mitochondria, magnesium and migraine , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[31]  U. Stephani,et al.  Self-regulation of Slow Cortical Potentials in Children with Migraine: An Exploratory Study , 2000, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.

[32]  P. Zaniol,et al.  Deficit of Brain and Skeletal Muscle Bioenergetics and Low Brain Magnesium in Juvenile Migraine: An in Vivo 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Interictal Study , 1997, Pediatric Research.

[33]  P. Delwaide,et al.  Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Migraine , 1989 .

[34]  Peter Kropp,et al.  Prediction of migraine attacks using a slow cortical potential, the contingent negative variation , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Cortical self-regulation in patients with epilepsies , 1993, Epilepsy Research.