Comprehension Monitoring, Stylistic Differences, Pre-Math Knowledge, and Transfer: A Comprehensive Pre-Math/Spatial Development Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) and Logo Curriculum Designed to Test their Effects

A comprehensive computer curriculum designed to teach pre-math/spatial skills was used to examine the performance of preschool children using computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and Logo software. Forty preschool children received approximately 80 percent of pre-math/spatial instruction via computer and approximately 20 percent via teacher instruction. The following pretest/posttest measures were used to assess gains in skill: pre-math knowledge (TEMA), comprehension monitoring (Flavell scale), spatial ability (color identification and pointing), and ability to transfer (mazes). Overall, field independent (FI) and field dependent (FD) children did not perform significantly different from each other on posttest measures. Reflective (Ref) children performed significantly better than impulsive (Imp) children on several measures including fewer trials on a maze task, more correct answers on color and color/direction questions, and less time on color/direction questions. Both FI/FD and Ref/Imp groups improved performance from pretest to posttest and made gains in pre-math knowledge and comprehension monitoring. Key factors of the computer instructional method are discussed.

[1]  G. E. Miller,et al.  The Effects of Mediated Programming Instruction on Preschool Children's Self-Monitoring , 1986 .

[2]  C. Canino,et al.  Cognitive Styles, Computerized Treatments on Mathematics Achievement and Reaction to Treatments , 1988 .

[3]  D. Clements,et al.  Effects of Computer Programming on Young Children's Cognition , 1984 .

[4]  Donna Gail Shaw,et al.  Effects of learning to program a computer in BASIC or Logo on problem-solving abilities , 1986 .

[5]  C. A. Moore,et al.  FIELD‐DEPENDENT AND FIELD‐INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLES AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS , 1975 .

[6]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Making programming instruction cognitively demanding: An intervention study , 1986 .

[7]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Different Logo Learning Environments and Mastery , 1985 .

[8]  Patricia F. Campbell,et al.  The Effects of Logo Experience on First-Grade Children's Ability to Estimate Distance , 1991 .

[9]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  Effects of Logo and CAI Environments on Cognition and Creativity , 1986 .

[10]  J. Allen Watson,et al.  Cognitive Style and the Selection of Logo Problem-Solving Strategies by Young Black Children , 1993 .

[11]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Children's Naive Conceptions and Confusions About Logo Graphics Commands. , 1987 .

[12]  David B. Palumbo,et al.  Programming Language/Problem-Solving Research: A Review of Relevant Issues , 1990 .

[13]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  On the Cognitive Effects of Learning Computer Programming: A Critical Look. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[14]  John H. Flavell,et al.  The development of comprehension monitoring and knowledge about communication. , 1981 .

[15]  Ellin Kofsky Scholnick,et al.  Initial Mastery of the Syntax and Semantics of Logo Positioning Commands , 1986 .

[16]  Roger P. Johanson Computers, Cognition and Curriculum: Retrospect and Prospect , 1988 .

[17]  P. Mussen,et al.  Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology , 1972 .

[18]  Robert H. Seidman,et al.  Computer Programming and Logical Reasoning: Unintended Cognitive Effects , 1989 .

[19]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Logo Programming on Cognitive Abilities and Achievement , 1987 .

[20]  J. Allen Watson,et al.  Logo Mastery and Spatial Problem-Solving by Young Children: Effects of Logo Language Training, Route-Strategy Training, and Learning Styles on Immediate Learning and Transfer , 1992 .

[21]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Logo as a Strategy for Developing Thinking , 1986 .

[22]  T. P. Cavaiani Cognitive style and diagnostic skills of student programmers , 1989 .

[23]  Joan K. Gallini A Comparison of the Effects of Logo and a CAI Learning Environment on Skills Acquisition , 1987 .

[24]  Gloria E. Miller,et al.  Learning Logo: The social context of cognition , 1988 .

[25]  R. Lehrer,et al.  Misconceptions and Errors in LOGO: The Role of Instruction. , 1991 .

[26]  Reset Your Button and Drive into Computer-Assisted Math , 1984 .

[27]  Harvey Mellar,et al.  Expressing the Student's Concepts versus Exploring the Teacher's: Issues in the Design of Microworlds for Teaching , 1993 .

[28]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  A chain of cognitive changes with learning to program in logo , 1987 .

[29]  Sheila R. Vaidya Individual differences among young children in Logo environments , 1985 .

[30]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Cognitive Consequences of Programming: Augmentations to Basic Instruction , 1986 .

[31]  Karen Swan Programming Objects to Think with: Logo and the Teaching and Learning of Problem Solving , 1991 .

[32]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Analogical Reasoning and Computer Programming , 1986 .