Measuring Logistics Performance: the Effectiveness of Mmog/Le as Perceived by Suppliers in the Automotive Industry

In spite of logistics having grown in importance lately, which included the discussion of concepts such as integrated logistics and supply chain management in the business agenda, little has been discussed about how to measure logistics performance. This paper analyzes the perception of logistics professionals about the effectiveness of MMOG/LE (Materials Management Operating Guideline/Logistics Evaluation), which is a set of recommendations regarding logistics and materials management that was created by the automotive industry to be used by those comprising its supply chain. The respondents, who were naturally all from the automotive industry (they were suppliers of large vehicle assemblers with industrial plants located in Brazil), had been previously trained on this logistics performance evaluation tool in order to implement it in their organizations. They filled in an email survey with Likert scale questions, early in 2008. Among other findings of the research, it was noticed that the impact of the MMOG/LE recommendation is stronger with respect to activities that had not been previously addressed by quality norms and recommendations. Most respondents also considered that their organizations were already efficient in integrating their activities with their customers (car assemblers) but rarely with their suppliers, which was acknowledged to be the bottleneck of their logistics systems.

[1]  R. M. Vanalle,et al.  Manufacturing strategies and work organization in an engine supply chain , 2002 .

[2]  R. L. Alcantara,et al.  Mudanças nos relacionamentos e estratégias para melhor coordenação da cadeia de suprimentos , 2001 .

[3]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The making of an expert. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[4]  Miguel Afonso Sellitto,et al.  Práticas logísticas colaborativas: o caso de uma cadeia de suprimentos da indústria automobilística , 2008 .

[5]  Gérson Tontini,et al.  Atributos de satisfação e lealdade em serviços logísticos , 2010 .

[6]  Karine Araujo Ferreira,et al.  Logística e troca eletrônica de informação em empresas automobilísticas e alimentícias , 2005 .

[7]  Chu‐Hua Kuei,et al.  Supply Chain – Logistics Management , 2002 .

[8]  Luis Felipe Roriz Scavarda,et al.  Evolução da cadeia de suprimentos da indústria automobilística no Brasil , 2001 .

[9]  A. Hirschman,et al.  The strategy of economic development , 1959 .

[10]  Bettye B. Burkhalter,et al.  The evolution of a continuous quality improvement process in a university setting: a working model for consideration , 1994 .

[11]  Rafael Teixeira,et al.  Gestão da cadeia de suprimentos: análise dos artigos publicados em alguns periódicos acadêmicos entre os anos de 2004 e 2006 , 2010 .

[12]  Sunil Chopra,et al.  Gerenciamento da cadeia de suprimentos: estratégia, planejamento e operação , 2003 .

[13]  Max Fortunato Cohen Uso da informação na economia da informação: um estudo na indústria do Estado de São Paulo , 2003 .

[14]  Mats Abrahamsson,et al.  Logistics platforms for improved strategic flexibility , 2003 .

[15]  A. C. G. Maçada,et al.  Gestão da informação interorganizacional na cadeia de suprimentos automotiva , 2009 .

[16]  Kleber Fossati Figueiredo,et al.  Logística e gerenciamento da cadeia de suprimentos: planejamento do fluxo de produtos e dos recursos , 2006 .

[17]  David Gebler Is Your Culture a Risk Factor , 2006 .

[18]  Sohail S. Chaudhry,et al.  A model of a decision support system based on case‐based reasoning for third‐party logistics evaluation , 2003, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..