Geologic uncertainty in a regulatory environment: An example from the potential Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository site

Regulatory geologists are concerned with predicting the performance of sites proposed for waste disposal or for remediation of existing pollution problems. Geologic modeling of these sites requires large-scale expansion of knowledge obtained from very limited sampling. This expansion induces considerable uncertainty into the geologic models of rock properties that are required for modeling the predicted performance of the site.One method for assessing this uncertainty is through nonparametric geostatistical simulation. Simulation can produce a series of equiprobable models of a rock property of interest. Each model honors measured values at sampled locations, and each can be constructed to emulate both the univariate histogram and the spatial covariance structure of the measured data. Computing a performance model for a number of geologic simulations allows evaluation of the effects of geologic uncertainty. A site may be judged acceptable if the number of failures to meet a particular performance criterion produced by these computations is sufficiently low. A site that produces too many failures may be either unacceptable or simply inadequately described.The simulation approach to addressing geologic uncertainty is being applied to the potential high-level nuclear waste repository site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, U.S.A. Preliminary geologic models of unsaturated permeability have been created that reproduce observed statistical properties reasonably well. A spread of unsaturated groundwater travel times has been computed that reflects the variability of those geologic models. Regions within the simulated models exhibiting the greatest variability among multiple runs are candidates for obtaining the greatest reduction in uncertainty through additional site characterization.

[1]  George Christakos,et al.  Stochastic simulation of spatially correlated geo-processes , 1987 .

[2]  Tierney,et al.  Total System Performance Assessment Code (TOSPAC): Volume 1, Physical and mathematical bases: Yucca Mountain Project , 1988 .

[3]  Joel Massmann,et al.  Hydrogeological Decision Analysis: 1. A Framework , 1990 .

[4]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  DECLUS: a FORTRAN 77 program for determining optimum spatial declustering weights , 1989 .

[5]  The use of simulated spatially distributed data in geology , 1980 .

[6]  W. C. Swadley,et al.  Preliminary report on late Cenozoic faulting and stratigraphy in the vicinity of Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada , 1984 .

[7]  F. Alabert,et al.  Non-Gaussian data expansion in the Earth Sciences , 1989 .

[8]  R. L. Williams,et al.  Three-dimensional model of reference thermal/mechanical and hydrological stratigraphy at Yucca Mountain, southern Nevada , 1985 .

[9]  Lynn W. Gelhar,et al.  Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications , 1986 .

[10]  A. Journel Geostatistics for Conditional Simulation of Ore Bodies , 1974 .

[11]  Peter R. King,et al.  Generation of correlated properties in heterogeneous porous media , 1988 .

[12]  Milton E. Harr,et al.  Reliability-Based Design in Civil Engineering , 1987 .

[13]  R. R. Eaton,et al.  LLUVIA: A program for one-dimensional, steady-state flow through partially saturated porous media , 1990 .

[14]  J. Jaime Gómez-Hernández,et al.  ISIM3D: and ANSI-C three-dimensional multiple indicator conditional simulation program , 1990 .

[15]  A. Journel Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions , 1983 .

[16]  Tierney,et al.  Preliminary estimates of groundwater travel time and radionuclide transport at the Yucca Mountain repository site , 1986 .