Development of an innovative technology to segment luminal borders of intravascular ultrasound image sequences in a fully automated manner

Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is the commonest intravascular imaging modality, it still is inefficient for clinical use as it requires laborious manual analysis. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a near real-time fully automated technology for accurate identification, detection, and quantification of luminal borders in intravascular images. This technology uses a combination of the novel approaches of a self-tuning engine, dynamic and static masking systems, radar-wise scan, and contour correction cycle method. The performance of the computer algorithm developed based on this technology was tested on a sequence of IVUS and True Vessel Characterization (TVC) images obtained from the left anterior descending (LAD) artery of 6 patients with coronary artery disease. The accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated by comparing luminal borders traced manually with those detected automatically. The processing time of the developed algorithm was also tested on a Dell laptop with an Intel Core i7-8750H Processor (4.1 GHz with 6 cores, 9 MB Cache). Linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses indicated high correlation between manual and automatic tracings (Y = 0.80 × X+1.70, R2 = 0.88 & 0.67 ± 1.31 (bias±SD)). Whereas analysis of 2000 IVUS images using one CPU core with a 30% load took 23.12 min, the same analysis using six CPU cores with 90% load took 1.0 min. The performance, accuracy, and speed of the presented state-of-the-art technology demonstrates its capacity for use in clinical settings.

[1]  Frits Mastik,et al.  Fully automatic luminal contour segmentation in intracoronary ultrasound imaging-a statistical approach , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Nassir Navab,et al.  A State-of-the-Art Review on Segmentation Algorithms in Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Images , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[3]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  Clinical Feasibility of 3D Automated Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Quantification Algorithm on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Comparison with Intravascular Ultrasound , 2015, European Radiology.

[4]  Xiangmin Zhang,et al.  Automated segmentation of coronary wall and plaque from intravascular ultrasound image sequences , 1994, Computers in Cardiology 1994.

[5]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[6]  Dimitris Koutsouris,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography: Basic Principles of Image Acquisition , 2012 .

[7]  Linda G. Shapiro,et al.  Computer and Robot Vision , 1991 .

[8]  D. Vince,et al.  Comparison of texture analysis methods for the characterization of coronary plaques in intravascular ultrasound images. , 2000, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[9]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  A fast two-dimensional median filtering algorithm , 1979 .

[10]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  J F Cornhill,et al.  Automated morphometry of coronary arteries with digital image analysis of intravascular ultrasound. , 1997, American heart journal.

[12]  Yuanyuan Wang,et al.  Estimating coronary artery lumen area with optimization-based contour detection , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Martin Wolf,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Automatic Peak Detection in Noisy Periodic and Quasi-Periodic Signals , 2012, Algorithms.

[14]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Segmentation of intravascular ultrasound images: a knowledge-based approach , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Automatic segmentation of calcified plaques and vessel borders in IVUS images , 2008, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[16]  Adolf Friedrich Fercher,et al.  Optical coherence tomography - development, principles, applications. , 2010, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[17]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  An automated method for lumen and media-adventitia border detection in a sequence of IVUS frames , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[18]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  Currently available methodologies for the processing of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography images , 2014, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[19]  Petia Radeva,et al.  Automatic segmentation of artery wall in coronary IVUS images: a probabilistic approach , 2000, Computers in Cardiology 2000. Vol.27 (Cat. 00CH37163).

[20]  Karel J. Zuiderveld,et al.  Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization , 1994, Graphics Gems.

[21]  Yasuhiro Honda,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  Tzung K Hsiai,et al.  A Review of Intravascular Ultrasound-based Multimodal Intravascular Imaging , 2016, Ultrasonic imaging.

[23]  J. Griffith,et al.  Assessment of normal and atherosclerotic arterial wall thickness with an intravascular ultrasound imaging catheter. , 1990, American heart journal.

[24]  D. Vince,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional segmentation algorithms for the identification of luminal and medial-adventitial borders in intravascular ultrasound images , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Colin Berry,et al.  Comparison of Intravascular Ultrasound and Quantitative Coronary Angiography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Progression , 2007, Circulation.